ArticleScientific reports2020
Detecting methylation signatures in neurodegenerative disease by density-based clustering of applications with reducing noise.
Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrative multi-omics and systems bioinformatics in translational neuroscience: A data mining perspective.Journal of pharmaceutical analysis · 2023Review
- Phenotype clustering in health care: A narrative review for clinicians.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2022Review
- Machine Learning in Epigenomics: Insights into Cancer Biology and Medicine.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Reviews on cancer · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
There have been numerous genetic and epigenetic datasets generated for the study of complex disease including neurodegenerative disease. However, analysis of such data often suffers from detecting the outliers of the samples, which subsequently affects the extraction of the true biological signals involved in the disease. To address this critical issue, we developed a novel framework for identifying methylation signatures using consecutive adaptation of a well-known outlier detection algorithm, density based clustering of applications with reducing noise (DBSCAN) followed by hierarchical clustering. We applied the framework to two representative neurodegenerative diseases, Alzheimer's disease (AD) and Down syndrome (DS), using DNA methylation datasets from public sources (Gene Expression Omnibus, GEO accession ID: GSE74486). We first applied DBSCAN algorithm to eliminate outliers, and then used Limma statistical method to determine differentially methylated genes. Next, hierarchical clustering technique was applied to detect gene modules. Our analysis identified a methylation signature comprising 21 genes for AD and a methylation signature comprising 89 genes for DS, respectively. Our evaluation indicated that these two signatures could lead to high classification accuracy values (92% and 70%) for these two diseases. In summary, this framework will be useful to better detect outlier-free genetic and epigenetic signatures in various complex diseases and their developmental stages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.