Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33335087›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2020

Appendectomy in Patients with Morbid Obesity: Laparoscopic versus Conventional Technique.

Mehmet Kağan Katar, Murat Başer, Pamir Eren Ersoy

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The Association of Polish Surgeons (APS) clinical guidelines for the use of laparoscopy in the management of abdominal emergencies. Part II.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2023
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Laparoscopic Appendectomy Is Superior in Patients with Higher Fat Thickness.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mehmet Kağan KatarDepartment of General Surgery, Yozgat Bozok University Faculty of Medicine, Yozgat, Turkey.
Murat BaşerDepartment of General Surgery, Yozgat Bozok University Faculty of Medicine, Yozgat, Turkey.
Pamir Eren ErsoyDepartment of General Surgery, Yozgat Bozok University Faculty of Medicine, Yozgat, Turkey.
Bozok Universitesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Our aim was to determine the optimum appendectomy technique in patients with morbid obesity by evaluating laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) and open appendectomy (OA) operations performed in these patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS The records of 2179 patients who underwent appendectomy for acute appendicitis between January 2010 and April 2019 were evaluated retrospectively. Patients were excluded for the following: age.

Indexed as

AppendectomyAppendicitisLaparoscopyObesity, MorbidPostoperative ComplicationsSurgical Procedures, OperativeAbdomenAdultFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleOperative TimeOutcome and Process Assessment, Health Care

Identifiers

PMID33335087
PMCPMC7733308
OpenAlexW3117829716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.