Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33334933›Full record

ArticleThe European respiratory journal2021

Identifying early pulmonary arterial hypertension biomarkers in systemic sclerosis: machine learning on proteomics from the DETECT cohort.

Yasmina Bauer, Simon de Bernard, Peter Hickey, Karri Ballard, Jeremy Cruz, Peter Cornelisse, Harbajan Chadha-Boreham, Oliver Distler, Daniel Rosenberg, Martin Doelberg and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European respiratory journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Omics in IgG4-related disease.Chinese medical journal · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Cardiac disease in systemic sclerosis: a narrative review.Archives of medical sciences. Atherosclerotic diseases · 2025
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Yasmina BauerGalapagos GmbH, Basel, Switzerland.
Simon de BernardAltraBio, Lyon, France.
Peter HickeyDept of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, Medical School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4683-7696
Karri BallardMyriad RBM, Austin, TX, USA.
Jeremy CruzMyriad RBM, Austin, TX, USA.
Peter CornelisseIdorsia Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Allschwil, Switzerland.
Harbajan Chadha-BorehamActelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Allschwil, Switzerland.
Oliver DistlerDept of Rheumatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Daniel RosenbergActelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Allschwil, Switzerland.
Martin DoelbergActelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Allschwil, Switzerland.
Sebastien RouxIdorsia Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Allschwil, Switzerland.
Oliver NaylerIdorsia Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Allschwil, Switzerland.
Allan LawrieDept of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, Medical School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK a.lawrie@sheffield.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-4192-9505
Idorsia (Switzerland) · CHActelion (Switzerland) · CHMyriad Genetics · USRoyal Hallamshire Hospital · GBUniversity Hospital of Zurich · CHUniversity of Sheffield · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/13/48/30453British Heart Foundation FS/18/52/33808British Heart Foundation PG/11/116/29288Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a devastating complication of systemic sclerosis (SSc). Screening for PAH in SSc has increased detection, allowed early treatment for PAH and improved patient outcomes. Blood-based biomarkers that reliably identify SSc patients at risk of PAH, or with early disease, would significantly improve screening, potentially leading to improved survival, and provide novel mechanistic insights into early disease. The main objective of this study was to identify a proteomic biomarker signature that could discriminate SSc patients with and without PAH using a machine learning approach and to validate the findings in an external cohort.Serum samples from patients with SSc and PAH (n=77) and SSc without pulmonary hypertension (non-PH) (n=80) were randomly selected from the clinical DETECT study and underwent proteomic screening using the Myriad RBM Discovery platform consisting of 313 proteins. Samples from an independent validation SSc cohort (PAH n=22 and non-PH n=22) were obtained from the University of Sheffield (Sheffield, UK).Random forest analysis identified a novel panel of eight proteins, comprising collagen IV, endostatin, insulin-like growth factor binding protein (IGFBP)-2, IGFBP-7, matrix metallopeptidase-2, neuropilin-1, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide and RAGE (receptor for advanced glycation end products), that discriminated PAH from non-PH in SSc patients in the DETECT Discovery Cohort (average area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.741, 65.1% sensitivity/69.0% specificity), which was reproduced in the Sheffield Confirmatory Cohort (81.1% accuracy, 77.3% sensitivity/86.5% specificity).This novel eight-protein biomarker panel has the potential to improve early detection of PAH in SSc patients and may provide novel insights into the pathogenesis of PAH in the context of SSc.

Indexed as

Pulmonary Arterial HypertensionScleroderma, SystemicBiomarkersHumansMachine LearningNatriuretic Peptide, BrainPeptide FragmentsProteomicsBiomarkersNatriuretic Peptide, BrainPeptide Fragments

Identifiers

PMID33334933
PMCPMC8276065
OpenAlexW3117062564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.