ArticleBMJ open2020
Reporting of methodological studies in health research: a protocol for the development of the MethodologIcal STudy reportIng Checklist (MISTIC).
Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Underserved groups could be better considered within population-based eye health surveys: a methodological study.Journal of clinical epidemiology · 2024Pooled it
- REPCAN: Guideline for REporting Population-based CANcer Registry Data.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2023Guideline
- Completeness of exercise reporting among randomized controlled trials on pelvic floor muscle training for women with pelvic organ prolapse: A systematic review.Neurourology and urodynamics · 2021Pooled it
- Key Features of Contemporary Pilot and Feasibility Trials: Protocol for a Methodological Study.Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica · 2026Review
- Article
- Bibliometric, methodological and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews with explicit AI disclosure statements: an exploratory meta-research study.BMC medical research methodology · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Patient and public involvement and engagement in methodology research: process, experiences, and recommendations from the SPIRIT- and CONSORT-Surrogate project.Research involvement and engagement · 2025Article
- Gender equality in leadership of HIV care cascade clinical trials: A methodological study.HIV medicine · 2025Article
- Access to treatment protocols and manuals for evidence-based psychological interventions for severe mental disorders: a survey of randomised trials included in network meta-analyses.BMJ mental health · 2025Article
- Measures of diabetic retinopathy treatment coverage: protocol for a methodological review.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Assessment of eHealth Literacy in Healthcare Service Users: Construction and Validation of a Measurement Instrument.Clinical practice and epidemiology in mental health : CP & EMH · 2025Article
- Proposed scenario for post-suicide attempt care for individuals undergoing gender transition.Epidemiologia e servicos de saude : revista do Sistema Unico de Saude do Brasil · 2025Article
- Use and application of geographical restrictions in systematic reviews with the aim of including studies about Germany: An update of a methodological review.Health information and libraries journal · 2024Review
- The policies on the use of large language models in radiological journals are lacking: a meta-research study.Insights into imaging · 2024Article
- Reasons for missing evidence in rehabilitation meta-analyses: a cross-sectional meta-research study.BMC medical research methodology · 2023Article
- Racial and Ethnic Representation in Preventive Intervention Research: a Methodological Study.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2023Article
- The importance of meta-research in dentistry.Evidence-based dentistry · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionMethodological studies (ie, studies that evaluate the design, conduct, analysis or reporting of other studies in health research) address various facets of health research including, for instance, data collection techniques, differences in approaches to analyses, reporting quality, adherence to guidelines or publication bias. As a result, methodological studies can help to identify knowledge gaps in the methodology of health research and strategies for improvement in research practices. Differences in methodological study names and a lack of reporting guidance contribute to lack of comparability across studies and difficulties in identifying relevant previous methodological studies. This paper outlines the methods we will use to develop an evidence-based tool-the MethodologIcal STudy reportIng Checklist-to harmonise naming conventions and improve the reporting of methodological studies. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will search for methodological studies in the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane Library, Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, check reference lists and contact experts in the field. We will extract and summarise data on the study names, design and reporting features of the included methodological studies. Consensus on study terms and recommended reporting items will be achieved via video conference meetings with a panel of experts including researchers who have published methodological studies. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The consensus study has been exempt from ethics review by the Hamilton Integrated Research Ethics Board. The results of the review and the reporting guideline will be disseminated in stakeholder meetings, conferences, peer-reviewed publications, in requests to journal editors (to endorse or make the guideline a requirement for authors), and on the Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research (EQUATOR) Network and reporting guideline websites. REGISTRATION: We have registered the development of the reporting guideline with the EQUATOR Network and publicly posted this project on the Open Science Framework (www.osf.io/9hgbq).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.