ReviewBMJ open2020
Optimising antimicrobial stewardship interventions in English primary care: a behavioural analysis of qualitative and intervention studies.
Review in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Systematic review of implementing stewardship activities to promote appropriate antimicrobial use.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2026Review
- Parents' perspectives on childhood antibiotic treatment in Ireland-a qualitative study.JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2025Article
- Article
- Implementation of a National Antimicrobial Stewardship Training Programme for General Practice: A Case Study.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Experiences of Oral Corticosteroid Use and Adverse Effects: A National Cross-Sectional Survey of People with Asthma.Patient preference and adherence · 2025Article
- To treat or not to treat? Oncologists' perceptions and experiences regarding overtreatment in end stage cancer patients.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- How, why and when are delayed (back-up) antibiotic prescriptions used in primary care? A realist review integrating concepts of uncertainty in healthcare.BMC public health · 2024Review
- Article
- A mixed-methods needs assessment for an antimicrobial stewardship curriculum in pediatrics.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2024Article
- Making microbes matter: storytelling's potential to make antibiotic resistance real and relevant to the public.npj antimicrobials and resistance · 2023Article
- Development and implementation of "handshake rounds": An antibiotic stewardship intervention for hospitalized adult patients with hematologic malignancies.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2023Article
- Coping with 'the grey area' of antibiotic prescribing: a theory-informed qualitative study exploring family physician perspectives on antibiotic prescribing.BMC primary care · 2022Article
- How can behavioural science contribute to qualitative research on antimicrobial stewardship in primary care?JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2022Review
- The feasibility and generalizability of assessing the appropriateness of antimicrobial prescribing in hospitals: a review of the Australian National Antimicrobial Prescribing Survey.JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2022Review
- Development of an intervention to support the implementation of evidence-based strategies for optimising antibiotic prescribing in general practice.Implementation science communications · 2021Article
- Changes in the management of urinary tract infections in women: impact of the new recommendations on antibiotic prescribing behavior in France, between 2014 and 2019.BMC health services research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveWhile various interventions have helped reduce antibiotic prescribing, further gains can be made. This study aimed to identify ways to optimise antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) interventions by assessing the extent to which important influences on antibiotic prescribing are addressed (or not) by behavioural content of AMS interventions. SETTINGS: English primary care.
interventionsAMS interventions targeting healthcare professionals' antibiotic prescribing for respiratory tract infections.
methodsWe conducted two rapid reviews. The first included qualitative studies with healthcare professionals on self-reported influences on antibiotic prescribing. The influences were inductively coded and categorised using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). Prespecified criteria were used to identify key TDF domains. The second review included studies of AMS interventions. Data on effectiveness were extracted. Components of effective interventions were extracted and coded using the TDF, Behaviour Change Wheel and Behaviour Change Techniques (BCTs) taxonomy. Using prespecified matrices, we assessed the extent to which BCTs and intervention functions addressed the key TDF domains of influences on prescribing.
resultsWe identified 13 qualitative studies, 41 types of influences on antibiotic prescribing and 6 key TDF domains of influences: 'beliefs about consequences', 'social influences', 'skills', 'environmental context and resources', 'intentions' and 'emotions'. We identified 17 research-tested AMS interventions; nine of them effective and four nationally implemented. Interventions addressed all six key TDF domains of influences. Four of these six key TDF domains were addressed by 50%-67% BCTs that were theoretically congruent with these domains, whereas TDF domain
conclusionsFurther improvement of antibiotic prescribing could be facilitated by: (1) national implementation of effective research-tested AMS interventions (eg, electronic decision support tools, training in interactive use of leaflets, point-of-care testing); (2) targeting important, less-addressed TDF domains (eg,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.