ReviewScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2020
A conceptual framework for Emergency department design in a pandemic.
Review in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Single-encounter elicitation framework for diagnostic excellence patient-reported measures: SEE-Dx-PRM.PEC innovation · 2024Article
- The Silent Burden: Investigating Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and Social Isolation Among Healthcare Workers During COVID-19.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Patient flow management in biological events: a scoping review.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Determining the New Norm Elements in Emergency Departments in Malaysia During a Pandemic: A Fuzzy Delphi Method.The Malaysian journal of medical sciences : MJMS · 2024Article
- Identifying the obstacles facing emergency nurses regarding treating CTAS1 and CTAS2 in Saudi Arabia.BMC emergency medicine · 2024Article
- The Evolving Phenotypes of Cardiovascular Disease during COVID-19 Pandemic.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2023Review
- Improving the mental health care process in response to Covid-19 pandemic: The case of a penitentiary mental health division.PloS one · 2023Article
- Changes in Emergency Department Case Severity and Length of Stay before and after COVID-19 Outbreak in Korea.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- The Impact of SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic on Patients Undergoing Radiation Therapy for Advanced Cervical Cancer at a Romanian Academic Center: A Four-Year Retrospective Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Assessment of novel ICT-EMS systems to improve emergency patient transportation during the COVID-19 pandemic.The American journal of emergency medicine · 2022Article
- Patients with Musculoskeletal Disorders Presenting to the Emergency Department: The COVID-19 Lesson.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Modeling Patient Flow in an Emergency Department under COVID-19 Pandemic Conditions: A Hybrid Modeling Approach.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Emergency department treatment process planning: a field research, case analysis, and simulation approach.Annals of translational medicine · 2022Article
- A qualitative study on a novel peer collaboration care programme during the first COVID-19 outbreak: A SWOT analysis.Nursing open · 2022Article
- When disasters strike the emergency department: a case series and narrative review.International journal of emergency medicine · 2021Review
- Preparations of Dutch emergency departments for the COVID-19 pandemic: A questionnaire-based study.PloS one · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe current COVID-19 pandemic is highlighting gaps around the world in the design and workflow of Emergency Departments (ED). These gaps have an impact on both patient care and staff safety and represent a risk to public health. There is a need for a conceptual framework to guide ED design and workflow to address these challenges. Such a framework is important as the ED environment will always remain vulnerable to infectious diseases outbreaks in the future.
aimsThis paper aims to address issues and principles around ED design and workflow amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. We propose a conceptual framework and checklist for EDs to be prepared for future outbreaks as well.
methodsA scoping literature review was conducted, of the experiences of EDs in managing outbreaks such as SARS, H1N1 and COVID-19. The combined experiences of the authors and the experiences from the literature were grouped under common themes to develop the conceptual framework.
resultsFour key principles were derived- (1) situational awareness, surveillance and perimeter defence, (2) ED staff protection, (3) surge capacity management and (4) ED recovery. The findings were integrated in a proposed conceptual framework to guide ED design in response to an infectious disease outbreak. There are various elements which need to be considered at ED input, throughput and output. These elements can be categorised into (1) system (workflow, protocols and communication), (2) staff (human resources), (3) space (infrastructure), and (4) supply (logistics) and are placed in a checklist for pragmatic use.
conclusionThe ED needs to be in a constant state of preparedness. A framework can be useful to guide ED design and workflow to achieve this. As all ED systems are different with varying capabilities, our framework may help EDs across the world prepare for infectious disease outbreaks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.