Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33334188›Full record

ArticleGlobal spine journal2022

Prevalence of Osteoporosis Treatment and Its Effect on Post-Operative Complications, Revision Surgery and Costs After Multi-Level Spinal Fusion.

Nikhil Jain, Lawal Labaran, Frank M Phillips, Safdar N Khan, Amit Jain, Khaled M Kebaish, Hamid Hassanzadeh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global spine journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Nikhil JainDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Lawal LabaranDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Frank M PhillipsMidwest Orthopaedics at Rush, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Safdar N KhanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Amit JainDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Khaled M KebaishDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Hamid HassanzadehDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8224-9517
University of Virginia · USJohns Hopkins Hospital · USRush University Medical Center · USThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designRetrospective cohort study.

objectiveTo study the prevalence of pre-operative osteoporosis treatment, and its effect on risk of ORC, revision surgery and costs in osteoporotic patients undergoing ≥3-level spinal fusion for degenerative pathology.

methodsPatients and procedures of interest were included using International Classification of Diseases (ICD) and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) coding. Our outcome measures were ORC at 1-year post-operatively and included instrumentation complications, pathological fracture, and revision surgery. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazards analysis was done to study the effect of osteoporosis treatment on risk of ORC.

resultsWe included a total of 849 patients with documented osteoporosis undergoing ≥3-level spinal fusion. White (85.6%), female (82.7%), and 60-79 years of age (79.9%) was the most common demographic. Of entire cohort, 121(14.3%) were on osteoporosis treatment prior to spinal fusion. Of treated patients, 52/121 (43.0%) had continued prescriptions at 1 year post-operatively. Treated patients and not-treated patients had 1-year ORC incidence of 9.1% and 15.0%, respectively. The average 1-year reimbursement/patient for managing ORC was $3,053 (treated) and $21,147 (not-treated). On adjusted cox analysis, pre-operative osteoporosis treatment was associated with a lower risk of ORC (HR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.28-0.99, p = 0.04).

conclusionsPre-operative osteoporosis treatment is associated with lower risk of ORC and revision surgery at 1-year after ≥3-level spinal fusion. There is a low incidence of osteoporosis treatment prior to spinal fusion, and subsequently a low rate of treatment continuation after surgery. These findings highlight the need for heightened awareness, patient education and management of osteoporosis before elective multi-level spinal fusion.

Indexed as

bisphosphonatebone densitycervicalcomplicationsfusionlumbarosteoporosisspinal fusionteriparatidevalue

Identifiers

PMID33334188
PMCPMC9210228
OpenAlexW3110902562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.