Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33333976›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2020

DockingApp RF: A State-of-the-Art Novel Scoring Function for Molecular Docking in a User-Friendly Interface to AutoDock Vina.

Gabriele Macari, Daniele Toti, Andrea Pasquadibisceglie, Fabio Polticelli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. In Silico Analysis and Biochemical Characterization ofJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Tianma Formula Alleviates Dementia via ACER2-Mediated Sphingolipid Signaling Pathway Involving AEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gabriele MacariDepartment of Sciences, Roma Tre University, 00146 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7519-4418
Daniele TotiFaculty of Mathematical, Physical and Natural Sciences, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, 25121 Brescia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9668-6961
Andrea PasquadibisceglieDepartment of Sciences, Roma Tre University, 00146 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1630-6982
Fabio PolticelliDepartment of Sciences, Roma Tre University, 00146 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7657-2019

Funding

Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Università e della Ricerca 2017483NH8Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Università e della Ricerca Dipartimenti di Eccellenza
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationBringing a new drug to the market is expensive and time-consuming. To cut the costs and time, computer-aided drug design (CADD) approaches have been increasingly included in the drug discovery pipeline. However, despite traditional docking tools show a good conformational space sampling ability, they are still unable to produce accurate binding affinity predictions. This work presents a novel scoring function for molecular docking seamlessly integrated into DockingApp, a user-friendly graphical interface for AutoDock Vina. The proposed function is based on a random forest model and a selection of specific features to overcome the existing limits of Vina's original scoring mechanism. A novel version of DockingApp, named DockingApp RF, has been developed to host the proposed scoring function and to automatize the rescoring procedure of the output of AutoDock Vina, even to nonexpert users.

resultsBy coupling intermolecular interaction, solvent accessible surface area features and Vina's energy terms, DockingApp RF's new scoring function is able to improve the binding affinity prediction of AutoDock Vina. Furthermore, comparison tests carried out on the CASF-2013 and CASF-2016 datasets demonstrate that DockingApp RF's performance is comparable to other state-of-the-art machine-learning- and deep-learning-based scoring functions. The new scoring function thus represents a significant advancement in terms of the reliability and effectiveness of docking compared to AutoDock Vina's scoring function. At the same time, the characteristics that made DockingApp appealing to a wide range of users are retained in this new version and have been complemented with additional features.

Indexed as

SoftwareDatabases, ProteinDrug DesignDrug DiscoveryLigandsModels, TheoreticalMolecular Docking SimulationReproducibility of ResultsUser-Computer InterfaceLigandsdockingfunctionmachine learningrandom forestscoring

Identifiers

PMID33333976
PMCPMC7765429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.