ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2020
DockingApp RF: A State-of-the-Art Novel Scoring Function for Molecular Docking in a User-Friendly Interface to AutoDock Vina.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- ActivityFinder: Toward the Fully Automatic Integration of Structural and Binding Affinity Data.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- Effects of an environmentally relevant mixture of organophosphate esters on the phenotype and function of HepG2 liver cells.Archives of toxicology · 2025Article
- Directed Evolution of AtMP2 Peptide: Unlocking Enhanced Antibacterial Potential fromMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Dual enhancement of pork color stability: Antioxidant activity and myoglobin structural compactness mediated by L-histidine/L-arginine.Food chemistry: X · 2025Article
- In silico structural analysis and biochemical characterization of a novel PETase from AntarcticComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
- MM-DRPNet: A multimodal dynamic radial partitioning network for enhanced protein-ligand binding affinity prediction.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Article
- In Silico Analysis and Biochemical Characterization ofJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2024Article
- Rationally Designed Novel Antimicrobial Peptides Targeting Chitin Synthase for Combating Soybean Phytophthora Blight.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Tianma Formula Alleviates Dementia via ACER2-Mediated Sphingolipid Signaling Pathway Involving AEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationBringing a new drug to the market is expensive and time-consuming. To cut the costs and time, computer-aided drug design (CADD) approaches have been increasingly included in the drug discovery pipeline. However, despite traditional docking tools show a good conformational space sampling ability, they are still unable to produce accurate binding affinity predictions. This work presents a novel scoring function for molecular docking seamlessly integrated into DockingApp, a user-friendly graphical interface for AutoDock Vina. The proposed function is based on a random forest model and a selection of specific features to overcome the existing limits of Vina's original scoring mechanism. A novel version of DockingApp, named DockingApp RF, has been developed to host the proposed scoring function and to automatize the rescoring procedure of the output of AutoDock Vina, even to nonexpert users.
resultsBy coupling intermolecular interaction, solvent accessible surface area features and Vina's energy terms, DockingApp RF's new scoring function is able to improve the binding affinity prediction of AutoDock Vina. Furthermore, comparison tests carried out on the CASF-2013 and CASF-2016 datasets demonstrate that DockingApp RF's performance is comparable to other state-of-the-art machine-learning- and deep-learning-based scoring functions. The new scoring function thus represents a significant advancement in terms of the reliability and effectiveness of docking compared to AutoDock Vina's scoring function. At the same time, the characteristics that made DockingApp appealing to a wide range of users are retained in this new version and have been complemented with additional features.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.