Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33332694›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical practice2021

Comparison of patients' diagnoses in a dermatology outpatient clinic during the COVID-19 pandemic period and pre-pandemic period.

Dursun Turkmen, Nihal Altunisik, Irem Mantar, Imge Durmaz, Serpil Sener, Cemil Colak

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Commentary on 'Psoriasis flare-up associated with second dose of Pfizer-BioNTech BNT16B2b2 COVID-19 mRNA vaccine'.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dursun TurkmenDepartment of Dermatology, Medical Faculty, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9076-4669
Nihal AltunisikDepartment of Dermatology, Medical Faculty, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6844-1097
Irem MantarDepartment of Dermatology, Medical Faculty, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey.
Imge DurmazDepartment of Dermatology, Medical Faculty, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey.
Serpil SenerDepartment of Dermatology, Medical Faculty, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey.
Cemil ColakDepartment of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, Medical Faculty, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey.
Inonu University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimIn this study, we compared the current diagnoses of patients admitted to the dermatology outpatient clinic with the diagnoses during the non-pandemic period, and we examined the effect of COVID-19 on the patient profile.

methodsDiagnoses were compared by examining the patient files of the 3-month period when the pandemic was influential in our country and the 2-week non-pandemic period corresponding to the same season a year ago. The outpatient diagnoses in the first month and the last month of the 3-month pandemic period were also compared.

resultsDuring the 3-month pandemic process, the most common reasons for applying to the outpatient clinic were acne, urticaria, psoriasis, and allergic/irritant contact dermatitis. Urticaria, psoriasis, allergic/irritant contact dermatitis, scabies, liken planus, mycosis fungoides, zona zoster, recurrent aphthous stomatitis and polymorph light eruption were statistically more common in the pandemic period. Moreover, acne, other eczematous dermatities, verruca, androgenic alopecia, and melanocytic nevus diagnoses were found to decrease statistically during the pandemic period when compared with the non-pandemic period.

conclusionUnlike other studies, the present study evaluated the patient diagnoses during the pandemic period and the period a year before and discussed the possible reasons for the changes in patient profiles.

Indexed as

COVID-19DermatologySkin DiseasesAdultAmbulatory Care FacilitiesFemaleHumansMalePandemicsSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID33332694
PMCPMC7883201
OpenAlexW3110732601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.