ReviewPLoS pathogens2020
Is Candida auris sexual?
Review in PLoS pathogens, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Defining thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Genetic and environmental control of parasexual reproduction in the pathogenicMicrobiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2025Review
- Characterization of susceptibility patterns and adaptability of the newly emerged Candida auris.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2025Article
- Fungal primary and opportunistic pathogens: an ecological perspective.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2024Review
- Ploidy changes in human fungal pathogens: Going beyond sexual reproduction.PLoS pathogens · 2022Article
- The Multifaceted Role of Mating Type of the Fungus and Sex of the Host in Studies of Fungal Infections in Humans.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- ClaID: a Rapid Method of Clade-Level Identification of the Multidrug Resistant Human Fungal Pathogen Candida auris.Microbiology spectrum · 2022Article
- Population genomic analyses reveal evidence for limited recombination in the superbugComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022Article
- The Curious Case of Nonrepetitive Centromeric DNA Sequences in Candida auris and Related Species.mBio · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.