Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33332408›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Artificial intelligence prediction of the effect of rehabilitation in whiplash associated disorder.

Alberto Javier Fidalgo-Herrera, María Jesús Martínez-Beltrán, Julio Cesar de la Torre-Montero, José Andrés Moreno-Ruiz, Gabor Barton

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Alberto Javier Fidalgo-HerreraBiomechanics department, Fisi(ON) Health Group, RetiaTech, Las Rozas, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8202-2670
María Jesús Martínez-BeltránSan Juan de Dios School of Nursing and Physical Therapy, Comillas Pontifical University, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3869-3626
Julio Cesar de la Torre-MonteroSan Juan de Dios School of Nursing and Physical Therapy, Comillas Pontifical University, Madrid, Spain.
José Andrés Moreno-RuizDepartament of Computing, University of Almería, Almería, Spain.
Gabor BartonSchool of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Universidad Pontificia Comillas · ESLiverpool John Moores University · GBUniversity of Almería · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The active cervical range of motion (aROM) is assessed by clinicians to inform their decision-making. Even with the ability of neck motion to discriminate injured from non-injured subjects, the mechanisms to explain recovery or persistence of WAD remain unclear. There are few studies of ROM examinations with precision tools using kinematics as predictive factors of recovery rate. The present paper will evaluate the performance of an artificial neural network (ANN) using kinematic variables to predict the overall change of aROM after a period of rehabilitation in WAD patients. To achieve this goal the neck kinematics of a cohort of 1082 WAD patients (55.1% females), with mean age 37.68 (SD 12.88) years old, from across Spain were used. Prediction variables were the kinematics recorded by the EBI® 5 in routine biomechanical assessments of these patients. These include normalized ROM, speed to peak and ROM coefficient of variation. The improvement of aROM was represented by the Neck Functional Holistic Analysis Score (NFHAS). A supervised multi-layer feed-forward ANN was created to predict the change in NFHAS. The selected architecture of the ANN showed a mean squared error of 308.07-272.75 confidence interval for a 95% in the Monte Carlo cross validation. The performance of the ANN was tested with a subsample of patients not used in the training. This comparison resulted in a medium correlation with R = 0.5. The trained neural network to predict the expected difference in NFHAS between baseline and follow up showed modest results. While the overall performance is moderately correlated, the error of this prediction is still too large to use the method in clinical practice. The addition of other clinically relevant factors could further improve prediction performance.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceAdultFemaleHumansMaleRange of Motion, ArticularRecovery of FunctionTreatment OutcomeWhiplash Injuries

Identifiers

PMID33332408
PMCPMC7746175
OpenAlexW3111504526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.