Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33332364›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

The importance of urban natural areas and urban ecosystem services during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Nelson Grima, Will Corcoran, Corinne Hill-James, Benjamin Langton, Haley Sommer, Brendan Fisher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Redefining Urban Recreation: A Demand Analysis for Urban Year-Round Green Exercise.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nelson GrimaEnvironmental Program, Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural Resources, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5563-691X
Will CorcoranEnvironmental Program, Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural Resources, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, United States of America.
Corinne Hill-JamesEnvironmental Program, Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural Resources, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, United States of America.
Benjamin LangtonEnvironmental Program, Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural Resources, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, United States of America.
Haley SommerEnvironmental Program, Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural Resources, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, United States of America.
Brendan FisherEnvironmental Program, Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural Resources, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6560-9093

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urban, peri-urban forests and other natural areas provide a wide range of material and non-material benefits to people known as ecosystem services. Access to these areas has been linked to benefits for physical and mental health of local populations. In the spring of 2020, the COVID-19 global pandemic forced many governments to impose a set of restrictions including the closure of businesses, cancelation of public events and schooling, social distancing, limitations on the size of social gatherings, and travel restrictions. During this period of restrictions, we conducted a study assessing the importance of urban and peri-urban forests and other natural areas to people living in and around the city of Burlington, Vermont, USA. We evaluated the self-reported use and changes in personal importance related to these natural areas before and during the period of restrictions. We received over 400 responses to our field survey. The results show that 69.0% of the respondents had increased or greatly increased their visitation rate to our natural areas and urban forests, and 80.6% of respondents considered that the importance of these areas, and access to them, either increased or greatly increased. Moreover 25.8% of the sample had either never, or very rarely accessed their local natural areas before the pandemic, but 69.2% of the first time or infrequent visitors reported that having access to these areas during COVID-19 as 'very important'. People reported that these areas were important for a wide range of activities from exercise to birding, but also reported values related to reducing stress in a time of global chaos. Our results indicate the increasing demand and value of such areas in times of crisis such as COVID-19. Experts in zoonotic disease predict the potential for more frequent pandemic events, thus predicating the importance for continued funding for, maintenance of, and improved access to, natural areas to our largely urban civilization.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesCOVID-19ForestsPandemicsUrban RenewalHumansVermont

Identifiers

PMID33332364
PMCPMC7746267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.