Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33331979›Full record

ArticleClinical drug investigation2021

Time to Treatment Discontinuation in German Patients with Schizophrenia: Long-Acting Injectables versus Oral Antipsychotics.

Jörg Mahlich, Kerstin Olbrich, Adrian Wilk, Antonie Wimmer, Claus Wolff-Menzler

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical drug investigation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jörg MahlichHealth Economics and Outcomes Research, Janssen, Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson, Neuss, Germany. joerg.mahlich@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1110-2793
Kerstin OlbrichHealth Economics and Outcomes Research, Janssen, Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson, Neuss, Germany.
Adrian WilkTeam Gesundheit, Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsmanagement mbH, Essen, Germany.
Antonie WimmerMedical Affairs, Janssen, Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson, Neuss, Germany.
Claus Wolff-MenzlerDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Göttingen, Georg-August-University, Göttingen, Germany.
Johnson & Johnson (Germany) · DEDAK-Gesundheit (Germany) · DEUniversitätsmedizin Göttingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveLong-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) are associated with better treatment adherence and persistence than oral antipsychotics (OAPs) in patients with schizophrenia. However, real-world evidence assessing the impact of treatment with LAIs in Germany is limited. To fill this gap, we compared antipsychotic medication adherence and risk of treatment discontinuation (TD) among schizophrenia patients newly initiated on LAI or who switched their OAP regimen (overall cohort; OC).

methodsClaims data of German schizophrenia patients who initiated LAIs or switched their OAP during 2012-2016 (index date) were retrospectively analyzed. Treatment switch was defined as add-on medication to existing prescription or terminating the existing prescription and initiating another OAP. Adherence and time to treatment discontinuation (TTD) were estimated. Determinants of treatment discontinuation were analyzed using two Cox regression models. Model 1 controlled for age, sex, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI); model 2 also included insurance status, and medication, visit, and psychiatric inpatient stay costs. Sensitivity analysis on patients who terminated existing prescriptions and initiated new OAPs (complete switch cohort; CSC) was performed.

resultsIn OC (n = 2650), LAI users had better adherence (35.4% vs. 11.6%), persistence (no 60-day gap; 40.7% vs. 19.8%), and longer TTD (median [95% confidence interval (CI)] 216 [193-249] vs. 50 [46-56] days) than OAP users. OAP usage (hazard ratio [HR] 1.89, 95% CI 1.73-2.06; p < 0.001) and greater CCI (HR 1.04, 95% CI 1.00-1.07; p = 0.023) were associated with greater risk of TD in model 1. Model 2 showed similar results. LAI users in CSC also had better adherence, persistence, and longer TTD. In CSC too, OAP usage and greater CCI were associated with greater risk of TD in model 1, but only CCI was significant in model 2. Higher pre-index psychiatric inpatient costs were associated with lower risk of TD (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.98-1.00; p = 0.014). LIMITATIONS: Inherent limitations of claims data and lack of control on OAP administration may have influenced the results.

conclusionThis real-world study associates LAIs with better medication adherence and lower antipsychotic discontinuation risk than OAPs.

Indexed as

Medication AdherenceAdministration, OralAdolescentAdultAgedAntipsychotic AgentsCohort StudiesDelayed-Action PreparationsFemaleGermanyHumansInjectionsMaleMiddle AgedProportional Hazards ModelsRetrospective StudiesAntipsychotic AgentsDelayed-Action Preparations

Identifiers

PMID33331979
PMCPMC7815621
OpenAlexW3112869235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.