Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33331949›Full record

ReviewDer Internist2021

[Upper abdominal pain: a frequent and multifaceted leading symptom in primary care internal medicine].

G Fröhlich, H Fröhlich

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Internist, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

G FröhlichInternistisch-hausärztliche Praxis mit Schwerpunkt Diabetes, Vorhonig 5, 65620, Waldbrunn, Deutschland. froehlich.georg82@web.de.
H FröhlichInternistisch-hausärztliche Praxis mit Schwerpunkt Diabetes, Vorhonig 5, 65620, Waldbrunn, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Upper gastrointestinal symptoms are among the most common reasons for medical consultation and represent a challenge for general practitioners in the outpatient care setting. History taking, symptom evaluation and physical examination are the crucial steps toward establishing an initial working diagnosis. The subsequent abdominal ultrasound and laboratory analyses are essential tools for the differential diagnosis.

Indexed as

Internal MedicinePrimary Health CareAbdominal PainDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansPhysical ExaminationUltrasonographyCholecystitisPankreatitisUltrasonography, abdominalUpper abdominal pain/diagnosis, differentialUpper abdominal pain/epidemiology

Identifiers

PMID33331949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.