Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33331885›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology2021

Local and systemic therapy of recurrent ependymoma in children and adolescents: short- and long-term results of the E-HIT-REZ 2005 study.

Jonas E Adolph, Gudrun Fleischhack, Ruth Mikasch, Julia Zeller, Monika Warmuth-Metz, Brigitte Bison, Martin Mynarek, Stefan Rutkowski, Ulrich Schüller, Katja von Hoff and 14 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. A brief history of ependymoma.Neuro-oncology · 2026
    Review
  4. Ependymoma: Advances in Systems Treatment Strategies.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2025
    Review
  5. B7-H3 CAR T Cells Are Effective against Ependymomas but Limited by Tumor Size and Immune Response.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Targeting EPHB2/ABL1 restores antitumor immunity in preclinical models of ependymoma.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review and update on pediatric ependymoma.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Intracranial Tumors in the First Year of Life.Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery · 2023
    Article
  15. Ependymoma: Evaluation and Management Updates.Current oncology reports · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Postoperative speech impairment and cranial nerve deficits after secondary surgery of posterior fossa tumours in childhood: a prospective European multicentre study.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Jonas E AdolphDepartment of Pediatrics III, University Hospital of Essen, Essen, Germany.
Gudrun FleischhackDepartment of Pediatrics III, University Hospital of Essen, Essen, Germany.
Ruth MikaschDepartment of Pediatrics III, University Hospital of Essen, Essen, Germany.
Julia ZellerDepartment of Pediatrics III, University Hospital of Essen, Essen, Germany.
Monika Warmuth-MetzInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology and Neurosurgical Clinic, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3544-319X
Brigitte BisonInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology and Neurosurgical Clinic, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5849-8671
Martin MynarekDepartment of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Center for Obstetrics and Pediatrics and Institute of Neuropathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Stefan RutkowskiDepartment of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Center for Obstetrics and Pediatrics and Institute of Neuropathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Ulrich SchüllerDepartment of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Center for Obstetrics and Pediatrics and Institute of Neuropathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Katja von HoffDepartment of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Denise ObrechtDepartment of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Center for Obstetrics and Pediatrics and Institute of Neuropathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Torsten PietschInstitute of Neuropathology, DGNN Brain Tumor Reference Center and Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Stefan M PfisterDivision of Pediatric Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Kristian W PajtlerDivision of Pediatric Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Olaf WittDivision of Pediatric Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Hendrik WittDivision of Pediatric Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Rolf-Dieter KortmannDepartment of Radio-Oncology, University Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8952-1819
Beate TimmermannDepartment of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen, Essen, Germany.
Jürgen KraußInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology and Neurosurgical Clinic, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.
Michael C FrühwaldUniversity Children's Hospital Augsburg, Swabian Children's Cancer Center, Augsburg, Germany.
Andreas FaldumInstitute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
Robert KwiecienInstitute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
Udo BodeInstitute of Neuropathology, DGNN Brain Tumor Reference Center and Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Stephan TippeltDepartment of Pediatrics III, University Hospital of Essen, Essen, Germany.
Essen University Hospital · DEGerman Cancer Research Center · DEUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversitätsklinikum Würzburg · DEUniversity Hospital Bonn · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEUniversity Hospital Augsburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurvival in recurrent ependymomas in children and adolescents mainly depends on the extent of resection. Studies on repeated radiotherapy and chemotherapy at relapse have shown conflicting results.

methodsUsing data from the German multi-center E-HIT-REZ-2005 study, we examined the role of local therapy and the efficacy of chemotherapy with blockwise temozolomide (TMZ) in children and adolescents with recurrent ependymomas.

resultsFifty-three patients with a median age of 6.9 years (1.25-25.4) at first recurrence and a median follow-up time of 36 months (2-115) were recruited. Gross- and near-total resection (GTR/NTR) were achieved in 34 (64.2%) patients and associated with a markedly improved 5-year overall survival (OS) of 48.7% vs. 5.3% in less than GTR/NTR. Radiotherapy showed no improvement in OS following complete resection (OS: 70 (CI: 19.9-120.1) vs. 95 (CI: 20.7-169.4) months), but an advantage was found in less than GTR/NTR (OS: 22 (CI: 12.7-31.3) vs. 7 (CI: 0-15.8) months). Following the application of TMZ, disease progression was observed in most evaluable cases (18/21). A subsequent change to oral etoposide and trofosfamide showed no improved response. PF-A EPN were most abundant in relapses (n = 27). RELA-positive EPN (n = 5) had a 5-year OS of 0%.

conclusionThe extent of resection is the most important predictor of survival at relapse. Focal re-irradiation is a useful approach if complete resection cannot be achieved, but no additional benefit was seen after GTR/NTR. Longer-term disease stabilization (>6 months) mediated by TMZ occurred in a small number of cases (14.3%).

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsEpendymomaAdolescentChildHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRadiotherapy, AdjuvantRetrospective StudiesTemozolomideTemozolomidechemotherapyependymomaradiotherapyrelapsetumor resection

Identifiers

PMID33331885
PMCPMC8168820
OpenAlexW3114294917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.