Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33331828›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2020

Detecting Miscoded Diabetes Diagnosis Codes in Electronic Health Records for Quality Improvement: Temporal Deep Learning Approach.

Sina Rashidian, Kayley Abell-Hart, Janos Hajagos, Richard Moffitt, Veena Lingam, Victor Garcia, Chao-Wei Tsai, Fusheng Wang, Xinyu Dong, Siao Sun and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Developing an LSTM Model to Identify Surgical Site Infections using Electronic Healthcare Records.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Sina RashidianDepartment of Computer Science, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1210-2939
Kayley Abell-HartDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Renaissance School of Medicine at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3887-8025
Janos HajagosDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Renaissance School of Medicine at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6251-9586
Richard MoffittDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Renaissance School of Medicine at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2723-5902
Veena LingamDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Renaissance School of Medicine at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5335-3721
Victor GarciaDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Renaissance School of Medicine at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4507-3839
Chao-Wei TsaiDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Renaissance School of Medicine at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0363-6322
Fusheng WangDepartment of Computer Science, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9369-9361
Xinyu DongDepartment of Computer Science, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0125-3419
Siao SunDepartment of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7341-2231
Jianyuan DengDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Renaissance School of Medicine at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0647-1287
Rajarsi GuptaDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Renaissance School of Medicine at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1577-8718
Joshua MillerDepartment of Medicine, Renaissance School of Medicine at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9512-461X
Joel SaltzDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Renaissance School of Medicine at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3451-2165
Mary SaltzDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Renaissance School of Medicine at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1554-5738

Funding

Scholars in BioMedical Sciences (SBMS) Training ProgramT32GM127253 · NIGMS · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI TSIRKA, STYLIANI-ANNA (STELLA) E · 2018 to 2022
$689k
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM127253
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiabetes affects more than 30 million patients across the United States. With such a large disease burden, even a small error in classification can be significant. Currently billing codes, assigned at the time of a medical encounter, are the "gold standard" reflecting the actual diseases present in an individual, and thus in aggregate reflect disease prevalence in the population. These codes are generated by highly trained coders and by health care providers but are not always accurate.

objectiveThis work provides a scalable deep learning methodology to more accurately classify individuals with diabetes across multiple health care systems.

methodsWe leveraged a long short-term memory-dense neural network (LSTM-DNN) model to identify patients with or without diabetes using data from 5 acute care facilities with 187,187 patients and 275,407 encounters, incorporating data elements including laboratory test results, diagnostic/procedure codes, medications, demographic data, and admission information. Furthermore, a blinded physician panel reviewed discordant cases, providing an estimate of the total impact on the population.

resultsWhen predicting the documented diagnosis of diabetes, our model achieved an 84% F1 score, 96% area under the curve-receiver operating characteristic curve, and 91% average precision on a heterogeneous data set from 5 distinct health facilities. However, in 81% of cases where the model disagreed with the documented phenotype, a blinded physician panel agreed with the model. Taken together, this suggests that 4.3% of our studied population have either missing or improper diabetes diagnosis.

conclusionsThis study demonstrates that deep learning methods can improve clinical phenotyping even when patient data are noisy, sparse, and heterogeneous.

Indexed as

deep learningdiabeteselectronic health records

Identifiers

PMID33331828
PMCPMC7775195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.