Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33331827›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2020

Use of Telemedicine for Emergency Triage in an Independent Senior Living Community: Mixed Methods Study.

Kelsi Carolan, David C Grabowski, Ateev Mehrotra, Laura A Hatfield

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Understanding Barriers to the Collection of Mobile and Wearable Device Data to Monitor Health and Cognition in Older Adults: A Scoping Review.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kelsi CarolanSchool of Social Work, University of Connecticut, Hartford, CT, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1737-1372
David C GrabowskiDepartment of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2915-5770
Ateev MehrotraDepartment of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2223-1582
Laura A HatfieldDepartment of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0366-3929
Harvard University · USUniversity of Connecticut · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOlder, chronically ill individuals in independent living communities are frequently transferred to the emergency department (ED) for acute issues that could be managed in lower-acuity settings. Triage via telemedicine could deter unnecessary ED transfers.

objectiveWe examined the effectiveness of a telemedicine intervention for emergency triage in an independent living community.

methodsIn the intervention community, a 950-resident independent senior living community, when a resident called for help, emergency medical technician-trained staff could engage an emergency medicine physician via telemedicine to assist with management and triage. We compared trends in the proportion of calls resulting in transport to the ED (ie, primary outcome) in the intervention community to two control communities. Secondary outcomes were telemedicine use and posttransport disposition. Semistructured focus groups of residents and staff were conducted to examine attitudes toward the intervention. Qualitative data analysis used thematic analysis.

resultsAlthough the service was offered at no cost to residents, use was low and we found no evidence of fewer ED transfers. The key barrier to program use was resistance from frontline staff members, who did not view telemedicine triage as a valuable tool for emergency response, instead perceiving it as time-consuming and as undermining their independent judgment.

conclusionsEngagement of, and acceptance by, frontline providers is a key consideration in using telemedicine triage to reduce unnecessary ED transfers.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansIndependent LivingMaleTelemedicineTriageemergency carefirst respondersindependent senior living communitiestelehealthtelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID33331827
PMCPMC7775198
OpenAlexW3101930818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.