Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33331559›Full record

ArticleRevista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo2020

SNAPPE II: ANALYSIS OF ACCURACY AND DETERMINATION OF THE CUTOFF POINT AS A DEATH PREDICTOR IN A BRAZILIAN NEONATAL INTENSIVE CARE UNIT.

Maria Marcia Farias Trajano Fontenele, Cristiana Ferreira Silva, Álvaro Jorge Madeiro Leite, Eveline Campos Monteiro Castro, Francisco Herlânio Costa Carvalho, Ana Valeska Siebra E Silva

Open access · diamondAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Revista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maria Marcia Farias Trajano FonteneleUniversidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0807-2784
Cristiana Ferreira SilvaUniversidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1571-0537
Álvaro Jorge Madeiro LeiteUniversidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8691-5986
Eveline Campos Monteiro CastroUniversidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6697-0013
Francisco Herlânio Costa CarvalhoUniversidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6400-4479
Ana Valeska Siebra E SilvaUniversidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3664-5073
Universidade Federal do Ceará · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo analyze the accuracy of the Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology Perinatal Extension (SNAPPE II) as a death predictor, to determine the cutoff point for mortality, and to analyze the association of independent variables with death.

methodsProspective, longitudinal, hospital-based study on newborns admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) for the first time from November 1, 2016 to April 30, 2017. Newborns with less than 12 hours of length of stay at the NICU, out-of-hospital births, major congenital malformations, and inter-hospital transfer were excluded. Variables were grouped according to hierarchical framework, related to maternal characteristics (distal level), prenatal and childbirth care (intermediate level), and birth conditions (proximal level). Descriptive analyses of SNAPPE II score ranges, Receiver Operating Characteristics Curve (ROC curve) to define the cutoff point for mortality, and bivariate analysis by the Wald test and multiple logistic regression were conducted.

resultsAfter selection, the sample consisted of 247 newborns. In this study, the SNAPPE II cutoff point for mortality was 27, with sensitivity of 84.1% and specificity of 82.4%. 61% of those with a score ≥27 died. Multiple logistic regression showed an association between death and proximal-level variables: sepsis (Odds Ratio [OR] 10.68; 95% confidence interval [95%CI] 2.82-40.48; p<0.001); SNAPPE II ≥27 (OR 5.85; 95%CI 1.90-18.05; p=0.002); birth weight 750-999 g (OR 4.15; 95%CI 1.06-16.14; p=0.040); and nonuse of surfactant (OR 0.159; 95%CI 0.04-0.53; p=0.003).

conclusionsNeonatal mortality was directly proportional to increase in SNAPPE II. Score≥27 increased the odds of dying by six times compared with neonates with lower scores. The proximal variables related to health conditions and neonatal care were associated with death.

Indexed as

AdultBirth WeightBrazilFemaleHospital MortalityHumansInfantInfant MortalityInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalLogistic ModelsLongitudinal StudiesMaleParturitionPredictive Value of TestsPrenatal CareSurface-Active Agents

Identifiers

PMID33331559
PMCPMC7747781
OpenAlexW3117787693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.