Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33331532›Full record

ArticleRevista de saude publica2020

Group Prenatal Care in Mexico: perspectives and experiences of health personnel.

Midiam Ibañez-Cuevas, Ileana Beatriz Heredia-Pi, Evelyn Fuentes-Rivera, Zafiro Andrade-Romo, Jacqueline Alcalde-Rabanal, Lourdes Bravo-Bolaños Cacho, Xochitl Guzmán-Delgado, Laurie Jurkiewicz, Blair G Darney

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista de saude publica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Midiam Ibañez-CuevasInstituto Nacional de Salud Pública. Centro de Investigación en Sistemas de Salud. Cuernavaca, MOR, México.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0245-1799
Ileana Beatriz Heredia-PiInstituto Nacional de Salud Pública. Centro de Investigación en Sistemas de Salud. Cuernavaca, MOR, México.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9998-9239
Evelyn Fuentes-RiveraInstituto Nacional de Salud Pública. Centro de Investigación en Sistemas de Salud. Cuernavaca, MOR, México.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5551-6133
Zafiro Andrade-RomoInstituto Nacional de Salud Pública. Centro de Investigación en Sistemas de Salud. Cuernavaca, MOR, México.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2797-9469
Jacqueline Alcalde-RabanalInstituto Nacional de Salud Pública. Centro de Investigación en Sistemas de Salud. Cuernavaca, MOR, México.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9172-2302
Lourdes Bravo-Bolaños CachoInstituto Nacional de Salud Pública. Centro de Investigación en Sistemas de Salud. Cuernavaca, MOR, México.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2816-2373
Xochitl Guzmán-DelgadoInstituto Nacional de Salud Pública. Centro de Investigación en Sistemas de Salud. Cuernavaca, MOR, México.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0398-9267
Laurie JurkiewiczUniversity of California San Francisco. San Francisco General Hospital. Department of ObGyn & Reproductive Sciences. San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2444-7689
Blair G DarneyOregon Health & Science University. Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology. Portland, OR, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8120-028X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIdentify barriers and facilitators to implementing the Group Prenatal Care model in Mexico (GPC) from the health care personnel's perspective.

methodsWe carried out a qualitative descriptive study in four clinics of the Ministry of Health in two states of Mexico (Morelos and Hidalgo) from June 2016 to August 2018. We conducted 11 semi-structured interviews with health care service providers, and we examined their perceptions and experiences during the implementation of the GPC model. We identified the barriers and facilitators for its adoption in two dimensions: a) structural (space, resources, health personnel, patient volume, community) and b) attitudinal (motivation, leadership, acceptability, address problems, work atmosphere and communication).

resultsThe most relevant barriers reported at the structural level were the availability of physical space in health units and the work overload of health personnel. We identified the difficulty in adopting a less hierarchical relationship during the pregnant women's care at the attitudinal level. The main facilitator at the attitudinal level was the acceptability that providers had of the model. One specific finding for Mexico's implementation context was the resistance to change the doctor-patient relationship; it is difficult to abandon the prevailing hierarchical model and change to a more horizontal relationship with pregnant women.

conclusionAnalyzing the GPC model's implementation in Mexico, from the health care personnel's perspective, has revealed barriers and facilitators similar to the experiences in other contexts. Future efforts to adopt the model should focus on timely attention to identified barriers, especially those identified in the attitudinal dimension that can be modified by regular health care personnel training.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelPhysician-Patient RelationsFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansInterviews as TopicMaternal-Child Health ServicesMexicoPregnancyPrenatal CarePrimary Health CareQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID33331532
PMCPMC7703532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.