Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33331455›Full record

ArticleActa cirurgica brasileira2020

Benefits of pentoxifylline for skin flap tissue repair in rats.

Stephanie Luzia da Costa Pedretti, Cícero de Lima Rena, Laura Alejandra Ariza Orellano, Marcela Guimarães de Lazari, Paula Peixoto Campos, Tarcizo Afonso Nunes

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta cirurgica brasileira, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.

Stephanie Luzia da Costa PedrettiFellow PhD degree, Postgraduate Program in Surgery and Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, Medical School, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte - MG. Reproduction Biology Center, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Brazil. Substantive scientific and intellectual contributions to the study; conception and design; acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data; technical procedures; histopathological examinations; manuscript preparation and writing.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1352-7613
Cícero de Lima RenaPhD, Department of Surgery, Medical School, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte-MG. Reproduction Biology Center, UFJF, Juiz de Fora - MG, Brazil. Substantive scientific and intellectual contributions to the study; conception and design; acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data; technicalprocedures; histopathological examinations; manuscript preparation and writing; critical revision.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7170-9226
Laura Alejandra Ariza OrellanoPhD, Department of General Pathology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte - MG, Brazil. Histopathological examinations, statistical analysis.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1509-8488
Marcela Guimarães de LazariMD, Department of General Pathology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte - MG, Brazil. Histopathological examinations, statistical analysis.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9912-9044
Paula Peixoto CamposPhD, Department of General Pathology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte - MG, Brazil. Analysis and interpretation of data, histopathological examinations, statistical analysis.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2016-2210
Tarcizo Afonso NunesPhD, Department of Surgery, Medical School, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte - MG, Brazil. Substantive scientific and intellectual contributions to the study; conception and design; acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data; technical procedures; critical revision; final approval.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7971-5786
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess the action of pentoxifylline, administered by subcutaneous route, on skin flap tissue repair in rats, and to verify the histological aspects and biomarkers.

methodsThirty-two male Wistar rats were divided into four groups: control (CT) and treated with pentoxifylline (P1, P3 and P5). Modified McFarlane technique flap was used. Ten days later, the animals were euthanized and the areas of viable and necrotic tissue were evaluated. Hematoxylin/eosin staining was used to assess the morphometric characteristics of the number of vessels and epithelial thickness. Picrosirius red was used to assess collagen density. VEGF and TGF-?1 levels on the skin flap and serum of the animals were measured by the ELISA method.

resultsThe macroscopic evaluation of the skin flap dimensions showed reduced necrotic tissue in the pentoxifylline (p < 0.05) treated groups. There was an increase in angiogenesis and reepithelization, demonstrated by analyses with an increased number of vessels (p < 0.05), VEGF and epithelial thickness. Fibrogenic effect showed decreased collagen density and TGF-β1 in the skin flap and serum.

conclusionThe benefits of pentoxifylline administered by subcutaneous route, at dose 100 mg/kg, which was effective to improve the survival of skin flap by acting on tissue repair components, stimulating angiogenesis and reepithelization, in addition to reducing fibrogenesis.

Indexed as

PentoxifyllineAnimalsGraft SurvivalMaleNecrosisRatsRats, WistarSkin TransplantationSurgical FlapsPentoxifylline

Identifiers

PMID33331455
PMCPMC7748074
OpenAlexW3116699425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.