Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33331431›Full record

GuidelineArquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery2020

BRAZILIAN GASTRIC CANCER ASSOCIATION GUIDELINES (PART 1): AN UPDATE ON DIAGNOSIS, STAGING, ENDOSCOPIC TREATMENT AND FOLLOW-UP.

Leandro Cardoso Barchi, Marcus Fernando Kodama Pertille Ramos, Osmar Kenji Yagi, Donato Roberto Mucerino, Claudio José Caldas Bresciani, Ulysses Ribeiro JÚnior, Nelson Adami Andreollo, Paulo Pimentel AssumpÇÃo, Antônio Carlos Weston, Ramiro Colleoni Neto and 51 more

Abstract readPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. INTRAPERITONEAL CHEMOTHERAPY FOR GASTRIC CANCER WITH PERITONEAL CARCINOMATOSIS: STUDY PROTOCOL OF A PHASE II TRIAL.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

61 authors.

Leandro Cardoso BarchiHospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8240-900X
Marcus Fernando Kodama Pertille RamosHospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0200-7858
Osmar Kenji YagiHospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4507-740X
Donato Roberto MucerinoHospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2432-0175
Claudio José Caldas BrescianiHospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4444-4792
Ulysses Ribeiro JÚniorHospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1711-7347
Nelson Adami AndreolloState University of Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7452-1165
Paulo Pimentel AssumpÇÃoFederal University of Pará, Núcleo de Pesquisas em Oncologia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3846-8445
Antônio Carlos WestonDepartment of Surgery, Santa Casa de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9854-8055
Ramiro Colleoni NetoDepartment of Surgery, School of Medicine, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5429-3692
Bruno ZilbersteinHospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1809-8558
Consensus members
Álvaro Antônio Bandeira Ferraz
Amir Zeide Charruf
André Roncon Dias
André Brandalise
André Maciel da Silva
Barlon Alves
Carlos Alberto Malheiros
Carlos Augusto Martinez Marins
Celso Vieira Leite
Daniel Szor
Durval R Wohnrath
Elias Jirjoss Ilias
Euclides Dias Martins Filho
Fabio Pinatel Lopasso
Felipe José Fernandez Coimbra
Fernando E Cruz Felippe
Flávio Daniel Saavedra Tomasisch
Flavio Roberto Takeda
Geraldo Ishak
Gustavo Andreazza Laporte
Herbeth José Toledo Silva
Ivan Cecconello
Joaquim José Gama Rodrigues
José Carlos Del Grande
Laércio Gomes Lourenço
Leonardo Milhomem da Motta
Leonardo Rocha Ferraz
Luis Fernando Moreira
Luis Roberto Lopes
Marcelo Garcia Toneto
Marcelo Mester
Marco Antônio Gonçalves Rodrigues
Marineide Prudêncio de Carvalho
Maurice Youssef Franciss
Nora Manoukian Forones
Oly Campos Corletta
Osvaldo Antonio Prado Castro
Osvaldo Malafaia
Paulo Kassab
Paulo Roberto Savassi-Rocha
Rodrigo Jose de Oliveira
Rubens Antonio Aissar Sallun
Rui Weschenfelder
Saint Clair Vieira de Oliveira
Thiago Boechat de Abreu
Tiago Biachi de Castria
Williams Barra
Wilson Luiz da Costa Júnior
Wilson Rodrigues de Freitas Júnior

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe II Brazilian Consensus on Gastric Cancer by the Brazilian Gastric Cancer Association (ABCG) was recently published. On this occasion, several experts in gastric cancer expressed their opinion before the statements presented.

aimTo present the ABCG Guidelines (part 1) regarding the diagnosis, staging, endoscopic treatment and follow-up of gastric cancer patients.

methodsTo forge these Guidelines, the authors carried out an extensive and current review regarding each statement present in the II Consensus, using the Medline/PubMed, Cochrane Library and SciELO databases with the following descriptors: gastric cancer, staging, endoscopic treatment and follow-up. In addition, each statement was classified according to the level of evidence and degree of recommendation.

resultsOf the 24 statements, two (8.3%) were classified with level of evidence A, 11 (45.8%) with B and 11 (45.8%) with C. As for the degree of recommendation, six (25%) statements obtained grade of recommendation 1, nine (37.5%) recommendation 2a, six (25%) 2b and three (12.5%) grade 3.

conclusionThe guidelines presented here are intended to assist professionals working in the fight against gastric cancer with relevant and current information, granting them to be applied in the daily medical practice.

Indexed as

Endoscopy, Digestive SystemNeoplasm StagingStomach NeoplasmsBrazilConsensusFollow-Up StudiesHumans

Identifiers

PMID33331431
PMCPMC7747489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.