Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33330966›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of bipolar disorders2020

Socio-demographic and clinical predictors of outcome to long-term treatment with lithium in bipolar disorders: a systematic review of the contemporary literature and recommendations from the ISBD/IGSLI Task Force on treatment with lithium.

Diane Grillault Laroche, Bruno Etain, Emanuel Severus, Jan Scott, Frank Bellivier, ISBD-IGSLI Joint Task Force on Lithium Treatment

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of bipolar disorders, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Characteristics of rapid cycling in 1261 bipolar disorder patients.International journal of bipolar disorders · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Lithium and Valproate in Bipolar Disorder: From International Evidence-based Guidelines to Clinical Predictors.Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Pharmacogenomics of Lithium Response in Bipolar Disorder.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Diane Grillault LarocheINSERM U1144 - Optimisation Thérapeutique en Neuropsychopharmacologie, Université de Paris Descartes, Paris, France.
Bruno EtainINSERM U1144 - Optimisation Thérapeutique en Neuropsychopharmacologie, Université de Paris Descartes, Paris, France. bruno.etain@inserm.fr.
Emanuel SeverusDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Jan ScottFaculté de Médecine, Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Frank BellivierINSERM U1144 - Optimisation Thérapeutique en Neuropsychopharmacologie, Université de Paris Descartes, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3660-6640
ISBD-IGSLI Joint Task Force on Lithium Treatment

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo identify possible socio-demographic and clinical factors associated with Good Outcome (GO) as compared with Poor Outcome (PO) in adult patients diagnosed with Bipolar Disorder (BD) who received long-term treatment with lithium.

methodsA comprehensive search of major electronic databases was performed to identify relevant studies that included adults patients (18 years or older) with a diagnosis of BD and reported sociodemographic and/or clinical variables associated with treatment response and/or with illness outcome during long-term treatment to lithium (> = 6 months). The quality of the studies was scored using the Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies from the National Institute of Health.

resultsFollowing review, 34 publications (from 31 independent datasets) were eligible for inclusion in this review. Most of them (n = 25) used a retrospective design. Only 11 studies were graded as good or borderline good quality. Forty-three potential predictors of outcome to lithium were identified. Four factors were associated with PO to lithium: alcohol use disorder; personality disorders; higher lifetime number of hospital admissions and rapid cycling pattern. Two factors were associated with GO in patients treated with lithium: good social support and episodic evolution of BD. However, when the synthesis of findings was limited to the highest (good or borderline good) quality studies (11 studies), only higher lifetime number of hospitalization admissions remained associated with PO to lithium and no associations remained for GO to lithium.

conclusionDespite decades of research on lithium and its clinical use, besides lifetime number of hospital admissions, no factor being consistently associated with GO or PO to lithium was identified. Hence, there remains a substantial gap in our understanding of predictors of outcome of lithium treatment indicating there is a need of high quality research on large representative samples.

Indexed as

Bipolar disorderClinical markersDepressionLithiumManiaPredictionPredictorsPsychiatryResponseTreatment

Identifiers

PMID33330966
PMCPMC7744282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.