Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33330952›Full record

ArticleEuropean child & adolescent psychiatry2022

Antisocial cognition as a mediator of the peer influence effect and peer selection effect in antisocial adolescents.

Ashley-John Brewer, Rob Saunders, Pasco Fearon, Peter Fonagy, David Cottrell, Abdullah Kraam, Stephen Pilling, Elizabeth Simes, Alisa Anokhina, Stephen Butler

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European child & adolescent psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ashley-John BrewerResearch Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.
Rob SaundersCentre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK. r.saunders@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7077-8729
Pasco FearonResearch Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.
Peter FonagyResearch Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.
David CottrellLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Abdullah KraamUniversity of Leeds and Rotherham Doncaster and South Humber NHS Foundation Trust, Leeds, UK.
Stephen PillingCentre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.
Elizabeth SimesResearch Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.
Alisa AnokhinaResearch Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.
Stephen ButlerResearch Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.
University College London · GBUniversity of Leeds · GBHealth Economics and Outcomes Research (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

Department of Health 12/136/70
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The peer influence and peer selection effects are two widely replicated findings in the criminological literature that refer to the predictive relationship between antisocial behaviour and delinquent peer association as well as between delinquent peer association and antisocial behaviour, respectively. Research suggests that antisocial cognition might constitute a causal mechanism underlying part of these effects. This study investigated the extent that the peer influence and peer selection effects are mediated by one key aspect of antisocial cognition-beliefs and attitudes supporting peer conflict. This study examined whether beliefs and attitudes supporting peer conflict mediated the relationship between delinquent peer association and volume of self-reported antisocial behaviour and vice-versa, across a 1-year follow-up period, in 683 (433 male, 250 female) British adolescents (mean age: 13.8 years) with a history of serious antisocial behaviour. Participants completed measures at baseline and 6, 12 and 18 months thereafter. Findings indicated that beliefs and attitudes supporting peer conflict partially mediated the peer influence and peer selection effects, explaining a substantial proportion of the total effect in the peer influence (i.e., 26%) and peer selection (i.e., 17%) models. These results suggest that beliefs and attitudes supporting peer conflict could explain part of the mechanism underlying the peer influence and peer selection effects in adolescents with a history of serious antisocial behaviour.

Indexed as

Adolescent BehaviorAntisocial Personality DisorderAdolescentCognitionFemaleHumansMalePeer GroupPeer InfluenceAdolescenceAntisocial behaviourMediation analysis

Identifiers

PMID33330952
PMCPMC8816781
OpenAlexW3110714480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.