Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33330900›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of infectious diseases2021

Sepsis and the Microbiome: A Vicious Cycle.

William D Miller, Robert Keskey, John C Alverdy

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of infectious diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Higher abundance ofmSystems · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

William D MillerDepartment of Medicine, Section of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Robert KeskeyDepartment of Surgery, University of Chicago, Pritzker School of Medicine , Chicago, Illinois, USA.
John C AlverdyDepartment of Surgery, University of Chicago, Pritzker School of Medicine , Chicago, Illinois, USA.
University of Chicago · US

Funding

RESEARCH TRAINING IN RESPIRATORY BIOLOGYT32HL007605 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI Yun Fang, Gokhan M. Mutlu · 1985 to 2026
$18.1M
PSEUDOMONAS'EFFECTS ON THE GUT BARRIER FROM SURGERYR01GM062344 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI ALVERDY, JOHN C · 2001 to 2025
$9.2M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007605NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM062344
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sepsis has been characterized as a dysregulated host response to infection, and the role of the microbiome as a key influencer of this response is emerging. Disruption of the microbiome while treating sepsis with antibiotics can itself result in immune dysregulation. Alterations in the gut microbiome resulting from sepsis and its treatment have been implicated in organ dysfunction typical of sepsis across multiple tissues including the lung, kidney, and brain. Multiple microbiota-directed interventions are currently under investigation in the setting of sepsis, including fecal transplant, the administration of dietary fiber, and the use of antibiotic scavengers that attenuate the effects of antibiotics on the gut microbiota while allowing them to concentrate at the primary sites of infection. The emerging evidence shows that the gut microbiome interacts with various elements of the septic response, and provides yet another reason to consider the judicious use of antibiotics via antibiotic stewardship programs.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial StewardshipGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHumansImmunitySepsisAnti-Bacterial Agentsantibioticsimmune systemmicrobiomesepsis

Identifiers

PMID33330900
PMCPMC8206800
OpenAlexW3111677299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.