Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33330735›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2020

Surgeon Applications of Patient Preferences in Treatment Decision Making for First-Time Anterior Shoulder Dislocation.

Brian C Lau, Carolyn A Hutyra, Benjamin Streufert, Shelby D Reed, Lori A Orlando, Joel C Huber, Dean C Taylor, Richard C Mather

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Conversion to Arthroscopic Surgery for Anterior Shoulder Instability Does Not Significantly Increase Patient Out-of-Pocket Costs, But Both Conversion and Initial Arthroscopic Management Are Twice as Costly as Isolated Nonoperative Management.Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Evidence-based treatment of Achilles tendon rupture.Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Brian C LauDuke Sport Science Institute, Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Carolyn A HutyraComprehensive Outcomes in Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation Data System, Duke Practice Transformation Unit, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Benjamin StreufertMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Shelby D ReedDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Lori A OrlandoDuke Center for Applied Genomics and Precision Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Joel C HuberDuke Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Dean C TaylorDuke Sport Science Institute, Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Richard C MatherDuke Sport Science Institute, Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTreatment of a first-time anterior shoulder dislocation (FTASD) is sensitive to patient preferences. The operative or nonoperative management debate provides an excellent opportunity to learn how surgeons apply patient preferences in treatment decisions. PURPOSE: To determine how patient preferences (repeat dislocation risk, recovery difficulties, fear of surgery, treatment costs) and surgeon factors influence a surgeon's treatment plan for FTASD. STUDY

designCross-sectional study.

methodsEight clinical vignettes of hypothetical patients with FTASD (including age, sex, and activity level) were presented to members of the Magellan Society. A second set of matched vignettes with patient preferences and clinical variables were also presented. The vignettes represented scenarios in which evidence does not favor one treatment over another. Respondents were asked how they would manage each hypothetical case. Respondents also estimated the risk of redislocation for the nonoperative cases for comparison with the published rates. Finally, respondents completed a Likert-scale questionnaire to determine their perceptions on factors influencing their decisions.

resultsA total of 103 orthopaedic surgeons completed the survey; 48% practiced in an academic hospital; 79% were in practice for 10 years or longer; and 75% had completed a sports medicine fellowship. Patient preferences were the single most important factor influencing treatment recommendation, with activity type and age also important. Just 62% of the surgeon estimates of the risk of redislocation were consistent with the published rates. The inclusion of patient preferences to clinical variables changed treatment recommendations in 62.5% of our hypothetical cases. Respondents rated patient treatment preference as the leading factor in their treatment decision making.

conclusionPatient preferences were important when deciding the appropriate treatment for FTASD. Respondents were inconsistent when applying evidence in their decision making and estimates of recurrent instability. Decision support tools that deliver patient preferences and personalized evidence-based outcome estimates improve the quality of decision making at the point of care.

Indexed as

decision analysisfirst-time shoulder dislocationpatient preferencesshoulder instability

Identifiers

PMID33330735
PMCPMC7720322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.