Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33330686›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in veterinary science2020

Cryptosporidiosis and Giardiasis in Buffaloes (

Monally Conceição Costa de Aquino, Sandra Valéria Inácio, Fernando de Souza Rodrigues, Luiz Daniel de Barros, João Luis Garcia, Selwyn Arlington Headley, Jancarlo Ferreira Gomes, Katia Denise Saraiva Bresciani

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prevalence and molecular characterization ofFood and waterborne parasitology · 2025
    Article
  2. Prevalence and molecular identification ofOpen veterinary journal · 2025
    Article
  3. Molecular Epidemiology ofMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Zoonotic giardiasis: an update.Parasitology research · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Monally Conceição Costa de AquinoEstácio de Sá University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Sandra Valéria InácioSchool of Veterinary Medicine Araçatuba, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Araçatuba, Brazil.
Fernando de Souza RodriguesLaboratory of Animal Protozoology, Department of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, State University of Londrina, Londrina, Brazil.
Luiz Daniel de BarrosLaboratory of Animal Protozoology, Department of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, State University of Londrina, Londrina, Brazil.
João Luis GarciaLaboratory of Animal Protozoology, Department of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, State University of Londrina, Londrina, Brazil.
Selwyn Arlington HeadleyComparative Pathology Shared Resources Laboratory, Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN, United States.
Jancarlo Ferreira GomesSchool of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Katia Denise Saraiva BrescianiSchool of Veterinary Medicine Araçatuba, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Araçatuba, Brazil.
Universidade Estadual de Londrina · BRUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BREstácio (Brazil) · BRUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BRUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

assemblagesCryptosporidiumgenotypesGiardiawater buffalozoonosis

Identifiers

PMID33330686
PMCPMC7673452
OpenAlexW3095065840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.