Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33330678›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in veterinary science2020

Participatory Epidemiology: Principles, Practice, Utility, and Lessons Learnt.

Robyn G Alders, Syed Noman Ali, Aluma Araba Ameri, Brigitte Bagnol, Tarni L Cooper, Ahmad Gozali, M M Hidayat, Elpidius Rukambile, Johanna T Wong, Andrew Catley

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Robyn G AldersKyeema Foundation, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Syed Noman AliLivestock Department, Government of Sindh, Karachi, Pakistan.
Aluma Araba AmeriPrivate Consultant, Juba, South Sudan.
Brigitte BagnolKyeema Foundation, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Tarni L CooperKyeema Foundation, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Ahmad GozaliFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Animal Health, Jakarta, Indonesia.
M M HidayatDirectorate General of Livestock and Animal Health Services, Ministry of Agriculture, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Elpidius RukambileTanzania Veterinary Laboratory Agency, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Johanna T WongCenter for Universal Health, Chatham House, London, United Kingdom.
Andrew CatleyFriedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy at Tufts University, Feinstein International Center, Boston, MA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Participatory epidemiology (PE) evolved as a branch of veterinary epidemiology and has been largely employed for the control and early warning of infectious diseases within resource-limited settings. It was originally based on combining practitioner communication skills with participatory methods to facilitate the involvement of animal caretakers and owners (embracing their knowledge, experience, and motivations) in the identification and assessment of animal disease problems, including in the design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of disease control programs, policies, and strategies. With the importance of understanding social perceptions and drivers receiving increasing recognition by epidemiologists, PE tools are being adapted for an increasingly wide range of settings and endeavors. More recently, PE tools have been adapted for use in food and nutrition security programs, One Health activities, wildlife disease surveillance and as part of mixed-methods research across a range of socio-economic settings. This review describes the evolution of PE (in relation to veterinary epidemiology and briefly in relation to public health epidemiology), the underpinning philosophy and principles essential to its effective application and the importance of gender-sensitive approaches and data triangulation, including conventional confirmatory testing. The article also provides illustrative examples highlighting the diversity of approaches and applications of PE, hallmarks of successful PE initiatives and the lessons we can learn when these are missing. Finally, we look forward, describing the particular utility of PE for dealing with emerging infectious diseases, gaining attention of field-level cross-sector officials who can escalate concerns to a higher level and for continuing to raise the voices of those less-heard (such as women, minority groups, and remote communities with limited exposure to formal education) in defining the problems and planning activities that will likely impact directly on their well-being and livelihoods.

Indexed as

emerging infectious diseasemedical anthropologyOne Healthparticipatory disease surveillanceparticipatory impact assessment

Identifiers

PMID33330678
PMCPMC7672004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.