ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2020
Current Devices in Mitral Valve Replacement and Their Potential Complications.
Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- MitraNav: Design and Modeling of a Robotic System for Transseptal Mitral Valve Replacement with Dock Catheter Task-Space Control.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Transesophageal Echocardiography in Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Characterization of Patients Unsuited for Transcatheter Mitral Valve Interventions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Complex mitral valve anatomy and open issues in transcatheter mitral valve replacement.Surgery in practice and science · 2023Review
- Unplanned J-valve implantation during open heart surgery for severe valvular annulus and ventricle calcification.Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC · 2022Article
- Three dimensional modeling of atrioventricular valves provides predictive guides for optimal choice of prosthesis.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Patient-specific fluid simulation of transcatheter mitral valve replacement in mitral annulus calcification.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Current Status of Catheter-based Mitral Valve Replacement.Current cardiology reports · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mitral regurgitation is one of the most prevalent valvulopathies worldwide, and its surgical treatment is not feasible in all cases. The elderly and frail with several comorbidities and left ventricular dysfunction are often managed conservatively. Percutaneous treatment (repair or replacement) of the mitral valve has emerged as a potential option for those patients who are at a high risk for surgery. Mitral valve repair with the Mitraclip device proved both increased safety and mortality reduction in patients with severe mitral regurgitation. On the other hand, in the last decade, percutaneous mitral replacement opened new frontiers in the field of cardiac structural interventions. There are few mitral devices; some are in the early phase of development and some are waiting for CE mark of approval. The evolution of these devices was more complicated compared to the aortic technology due to the native mitral valve's complexity and access. This review aims to provide an overview of the current devices, their specific features, and their potential complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.