ReviewFrontiers in medicine2020
Non-biological Complex Drugs (NBCDs): Complex Pharmaceuticals in Need of Individual Robust Clinical Assessment Before Any Therapeutic Equivalence Decision.
Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of intravenous iron-carbohydrate complexes in HFrEF patients with iron deficiency.ESC heart failure · 2023Pooled it
- Structure-Function Relationships in Polysaccharide-Iron Complexes: Molecular Characterization, Acid-Stress Release Stability, and Gastrointestinal Tolerability.Pharmaceutics · 2026Article
- Decrypting the Potential of Lipidic Vesicular System for Delivery Enhancement of Tranexamic Acid in Melasma Hyperpigmentation Treatment.Advanced pharmaceutical bulletin · 2025Review
- Advancing Regulatory Oversight of Medical Device Trials to Align with Clinical Drug Standards in the European Union.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Generics, Biosimilars and Follow-On Non-Biologic Complex Drugs for Multiple Sclerosis: A Narrative Review of the Regulatory and Clinical Implications for European Neurologists.European journal of neurology · 2025Review
- Insights into Liposomal and Gel-Based Formulations for Dermatological Treatments.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- A narrative review on the safety of glatiramer acetate in multiple sclerosis: focus on Europe.Therapeutic advances in chronic disease · 2025Review
- Regulatory pathways and guidelines for nanotechnology-enabled health products: a comparative review of EU and US frameworks.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Nanomedicines against Chagas disease: a critical review.Beilstein journal of nanotechnology · 2024Review
- Synthetic polypeptides using a biologic as a reference medicinal product - the European landscape of regulatory approvals.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Review
- PEGylated therapeutics in the clinic.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2024Review
- Exploiting Pharma 4.0 Technologies in the Non-Biological Complex Drugs Manufacturing: Innovations and Implications.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- Differences in Physico-Chemical Properties and Immunological Response in Nanosimilar Complex Drugs: The Case of Liposomal Doxorubicin.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- More Than Pigments: The Potential of Astaxanthin and Bacterioruberin-Based Nanomedicines.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- Regulatory considerations for generic products of non-biological complex drugs.Journal of food and drug analysis · 2023Review
- Intravenous ferric carboxymaltose for the management of iron deficiency and iron deficiency anaemia in children and adolescents: a review.European journal of pediatrics · 2022Review
- Future perspectives for advancing regulatory science of nanotechnology-enabled health products.Drug delivery and translational research · 2022Article
- How Do Hospital Pharmacists Approach Substitution of Nanomedicines? Insights from a Qualitative Pilot Study and a Quantitative Market Research Analysis in Five European Countries.Pharmaceutics · 2021Article
- Mass spectrometry-based methods to characterize highly heterogeneous biopharmaceuticals, vaccines, and nonbiological complex drugs at the intact-mass level.Mass spectrometry reviewsReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Non-Biological Complex Drugs (NBCDs) are complex non-biological drugs comprised of large high molecular weight molecules and, often, nanoparticular structures (including liposomes and block-copolymer micelles). In the case of NBCDs, the entire complex is the active pharmaceutical ingredient and its properties cannot be fully characterized by physicochemical analysis. Moreover, the manufacturing process is fundamental in creating the correct originator product. The same is true for generic versions of the product. A recent appraisal of approval procedures for NBCDs "follow-on products" approved in Europe shows a diversity of regulatory pathways. In fact, three different abridged application procedures, under European legislation, were used: the generic application procedure of Article 10(1), the hybrid application procedure of Article 10(3), and the biosimilar application procedure of Article 10(4). Three informed consent applications via Article 10(c) from innovator companies of glatiramer acetate and sevelamer carbonate were submitted shortly after the approval of the first follow-on products. Furthermore, a number of "well-established use" applications [via Article 10(a)] were approved for iron sucrose and iron dextran complexes. In order to protect patients from the increased risks of NBCD products and NBCD follow-on products, two complementary approaches should be considered: (i) improving the regulatory procedures and their guidance documents within the pre-registration phase, and (ii) not considering interchangeability whenever clinical data is not available. With regards to the latter, the need for adequate safety and efficacy data might also include risk management programmes within post-approval pharmacovigilance actions. This, however, would depend on a risk appraisal that must be considered for individual medicinal products, based on the nature of the submitted relevant set of safety/efficacy data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.