Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33330329›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2020

The Family Health Scale: Reliability and Validity of a Short- and Long-Form.

AliceAnn Crandall, Nomi S Weiss-Laxer, Eliza Broadbent, Erin Kramer Holmes, Brianna Michele Magnusson, Lauren Okano, Jerica M Berge, Michael D Barnes, Carl Lee Hanson, Blake L Jones and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed, 126 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Can family health alleviate income-related health disparity in China? A population-based study.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

AliceAnn CrandallDepartment of Public Health, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, United States.
Nomi S Weiss-LaxerDepartment of Family Medicine, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, United States.
Eliza BroadbentDepartment of Public Health, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, United States.
Erin Kramer HolmesSchool of Family Life, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, United States.
Brianna Michele MagnussonDepartment of Public Health, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, United States.
Lauren OkanoPuget Sound Educational Service District, Renton, WA, United States.
Jerica M BergeDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Michael D BarnesDepartment of Public Health, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, United States.
Carl Lee HansonDepartment of Public Health, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, United States.
Blake L JonesDepartment of Psychology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, United States.
Len B NovillaDepartment of Public Health, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, United States.
Brigham Young University · USPuget Sound Educational Service District · USUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New York · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Families strongly influence the health of communities and individuals across the life course, but no validated measure of family health exists. The absence of such a measure has limited the examination of family health trends and the intersection of family health with individual and community health. The purpose of this study was to examine the reliability and validity of the Family Health Scale (FHS), creating a multi-factor long-form and a uniform short-form. The primary sample included 1,050 adults recruited from a national quota sample Qualtrics panel. Mplus version 7 was used to analyze the data using a structural equation modeling framework. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) confirmed a 32-item, 4-factor long-form scale. The four factors included (1) family social and emotional health processes; (2) family healthy lifestyle; (3) family health resources; and (4) family external social supports. A 10-item short-form of the FHS was also validated in the initial sample and a second sample of 401 adults. Both the long-form and short-form FHS correlated in the expected direction with validated measures of family functioning and healthy lifestyle. A preliminary assessment of clinical cutoffs in the short-form were correlated with depression risk. The FHS offers the potential to assess family health trends and to develop accessible, de-identified databases on the well-being of families. Important next steps include validating the scale among multiple family members and collecting longitudinal data.

Indexed as

Family HealthAdultFactor Analysis, StatisticalHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnairesdepressionfactor analysisfamily healthpsychometricsstructural equation modeling

Identifiers

PMID33330329
PMCPMC7717993
OpenAlexW3107736531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.