ArticleFrontiers in public health2020
Measurement for Change: From Idea to Approach.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Design-redesign, implementation, and evaluation of effectiveness of maternal nutrition and responsive parenting program on child development at 2 years of age from rural India: a cluster RCT.Frontiers in public health · 2023Trial
- Editorial: Achieving impacts at scale in early childhood interventions: innovations in monitoring, evaluation, and learning.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Monitoring, evaluation, and learning: the key to building effective partnerships with government to improve maternal and child health in the Rakai and Kyotera Districts of Uganda.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Scaling theFrontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Transdermal delivery of micronutrients through fortified body oil and cosmetics: a potential roadmap for future scale up.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Leveraging monitoring, evaluation, and learning to scale the Enabling InclusionFrontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Integrating father involvement into early childhood initiatives delivered at scale: key considerations.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Realising distributed leadership through measurement for change.Frontiers in public health · 2023Review
- Review
- Cementing Partnerships: Applying a Network-Mapping Tool in Tajikistan.Frontiers in public health · 2021Article
- The Aspirations of Measurement for Change.Frontiers in public health · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Measurement for Change proposes an integration of monitoring, evaluation, and learning into decision-making systems that support sustainable transition of interventions to scale. It was developed using a cyclical, interactive 1-year dialogue between early childhood development (ECD) practitioners and academics from across the globe. Details are presented in Krapels et al. (1) as part of this special issue in Frontiers. In this paper, we trace the developments that inspired Measurement for Change and the novel ways in which the approach and the special issue was developed. The experience, and the reflections on this experience, are intended to inform those implementing initiatives that similarly seek to integrate practitioner- and academic experiences in support of sustainable transitions of interventions to scale.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.