Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33329986›Full record

ArticleCureus2020

Breast Cancer Patients' Perceptions of Their Experience With Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting and Its Impact on Quality of Life in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Ahmed B Ilyas, Reem K Bahaj, Azzam A Shaikh, Bashaer S Khawandanah, Meteb Al-Foheidi, Tagwa Y Omer

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Efficacy and safety of Lignosus rhinocerus (Cooke) Ryvarden TM02BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2025
    Trial
  2. Sexual health of female breast cancer survivors and their partners.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ahmed B IlyasOncology, Umm Al-Qura University, Mecca, SAU.
Reem K BahajOncology, King Abdulaziz University Faculty of Medicine, Jeddah, SAU.
Azzam A ShaikhOncology, Umm Al-Qura University, Mecca, SAU.
Bashaer S KhawandanahOncology, Umm Al-Qura University, Mecca, SAU.
Meteb Al-FoheidiMedical Oncology, College of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, SAU.
Tagwa Y OmerNursing, College of Nursing, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, SAU.
King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences · SAKing Abdulaziz University · SAUmm al-Qura University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Breast cancer accounts for 11.6% of all neoplasms worldwide and is the commonest cancer among Saudi females (29.7%). Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is a very common side effect of chemotherapy that has a great impact on the quality of life (QoL) of patients. Literature is still scarce about this effect on the Saudi population. This study aims to explore breast cancer patients' perception of their experience with CINV and its impact on QoL. Methods This is a cross-sectional retrospective study conducted on Saudi adult female breast cancer patients who underwent chemotherapy at King Abdulaziz Medical City, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Data collected through patients' records review, face-to-face and telephone structured interviews using a questionnaire composed of four parts: sociodemographic characteristics, nature of acute CINV (within 24 hours) and delayed CINV (after 24 hours), impact on QoL, and general information on their experience. Results Out of a total population of 173, 98 (56.65%) patients participated in the study. The main findings show that 78.6% experienced nausea, whereas 35.7% experienced vomiting. Most participants had a moderate-to-extreme impact on their QoL due to nausea (74.0%) and vomiting (62.9%). Overall, 57.5% rated anti-emetics as excellent for controlling CINV, whereas 22.9% rated them as moderate to good; 83.5% were completely compliant on anti-emetics and 71.1% reported that they received completely comprehensive education about CINV. Religious practices (74.4%), diet (57.7%), and relaxation techniques (44.9%) were found to be the most common non-pharmacological methods used to control CINV. No significant correlation was found between the effect of CINV on QoL and sociodemographic characteristics (p > 0.05). Conclusions CINV is very common among Saudi adult female breast cancer patients; despite being completely compliant and receiving comprehensive education and effective anti-emetics; CINV still had a high impact on different aspects of QoL. Health care professionals should consider CINV as an issue and should find effective strategies for alleviating patients' suffering.

Indexed as

antiemeticsantineoplastic agentsbreast neoplasmschemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting (cinv)femalenauseaquality of lifesaudi arabiasurveys and questionnairesvomiting

Identifiers

PMID33329986
PMCPMC7733774
OpenAlexW3111262014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.