Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33329943›Full record

ArticleIEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine2021

Assessment of Carotid Arterial Stiffness in Community Settings With ARTSENS®.

Jayaraj Joseph, P M Nabeel, Sudha Ramachandra Rao, Ramachandran Venkatachalam, Malay Ilesh Shah, Prabhdeep Kaur

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Cohort Profile: The Nijmegen Exercise Study (NES).International journal of epidemiology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Vascular Aging: Assessment and Intervention.Clinical interventions in aging · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jayaraj JosephDepartment of Electrical EngineeringIndian Institute of Technology MadrasChennai600036India.
P M NabeelHealthcare Technology Innovation CentreIndian Institute of Technology MadrasChennai600113India.
Sudha Ramachandra RaoIndian Council of Medical ResearchNational Institute of EpidemiologyChennai600077India.
Ramachandran VenkatachalamIndian Council of Medical ResearchNational Institute of EpidemiologyChennai600077India.
Malay Ilesh ShahHealthcare Technology Innovation CentreIndian Institute of Technology MadrasChennai600113India.
Prabhdeep KaurIndian Council of Medical ResearchNational Institute of EpidemiologyChennai600077India.
Indian Council of Medical Research · INIndian Institute of Technology Madras · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe investigate the field feasibility of carotid stiffness measurement using ARTSENS® Touch and report the first community-level data from India.

methodIn an analytical cross-sectional survey among 1074 adults, we measured specific stiffness index ([Formula: see text]), pressure-strain elastic modulus ([Formula: see text]), arterial compliance (AC), and one-point pulse wave velocity (PWV[Formula: see text]) from the left common carotid artery. Data for established risk factors (waist circumference, blood pressure, plasma glucose, triglycerides, and HDL-C) were also collected. The association of carotid stiffness with age, gender, hypertension/diabetes, smoking, and clustering of risk factors was studied.

resultsMeasurements were repeatable with a relative difference (RD) between consecutive readings of < 5% for blood pressure and < 15% for [Formula: see text]% of arterial diameter values. The average RDs for [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], AC, and PWV[Formula: see text], were 20.51%, 22.31%, 25.10%, and 14.13%, respectively. Typical range for stiffness indices among females and males were [Formula: see text]: 8.12 ± 3.59 vs 6.51 ± 2.78, [Formula: see text]: 113.24 ± 56.12 kPa vs 92.33 ± 40.65 kPa, PWV[Formula: see text]: 6.32 ± 1.38 ms

conclusionThe study demonstrated the feasibility of carotid stiffness measurement in a community setting. A positive association between the risk factors and carotid artery stiffness provides evidence for the device's use in resource-constrained settings. Clinical Impact: The device paves the way for epidemiological and clinical studies that are essential for establishing population-level nomograms for wide-spread use of carotid stiffness in clinical practice and field screening of 'at-risk' subjects.

Indexed as

Vascular StiffnessAdultBlood PressureCarotid ArteriesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMalePulse Wave AnalysisARTSENSCarotid artery stiffnesscarotid distensibilityendothelial dysfunctionpopulation distributionpopulation studypulse wave velocityultrasoundvascular stiffness

Identifiers

PMID33329943
PMCPMC7732146
OpenAlexW3108561744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.