ArticleSafety and health at work2020
A Study on Concentration, Identification, and Reduction of Airborne Microorganisms in the Military Working Dog Clinic.
Article in Safety and health at work, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Airborne bacterial profiling and air disinfection efficacy in small animal hospitals in South Korea.Journal of veterinary science · 2026Article
- Environmental bacterial load during surgical and ultrasound procedures in a Swedish small animal hospital.Acta veterinaria Scandinavica · 2024Article
- The Antimicrobial Effect ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Veterinarians as a Risk Group for Zoonoses: Exposure, Knowledge and Protective Practices in Finland.Safety and health at work · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe study was planned to show the status of indoor microorganisms and the status of the reduction device in the military dog clinic.
methodsAirborne microbes were analyzed according to the number of daily patient canines. For identification of bacteria, sampled bacteria was identified using VITEK®2 and molecular method. The status of indoor microorganisms according to the operation of the ventilation system was analyzed.
resultsAirborne bacteria and fungi concentrations were 1000.6 ± 800.7 CFU/m
conclusionAirborne bacteria in the clinic tend to increase with the number of canines. Human pathogenic bacteria were mainly detected in VITEK®2, and relatively various bacteria were detected in molecular analysis. A decrease in the level of bacteria and fungi was observed with proper operation of the ventilation system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.