ArticleJournal of virus eradication2020
Clinical outcomes of HIV-1 infected patients switched from complex multi-tablet regimens to tenofovir alafenamide based single-tablet regimens plus a boosted protease inhibitor in a real-world setting.
Article in Journal of virus eradication, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk of dyslipidaemia in people living with HIV who are taking tenofovir alafenamide: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2024Pooled it
- Baseline and week 48 resistance analysis in participants receiving bictegravir + lenacapavir in the phase 2 ARTISTRY-1 study.AIDS (London, England) · 2026Trial
- Efficacy and Safety of Bictegravir Plus Lenacapavir: 48-Week Outcomes in People With HIV-1 Who Are Virologically Suppressed on Complex Antiretroviral Regimens at Baseline.Open forum infectious diseases · 2025Trial
- Efficacy and Safety of Switching to Daily Bictegravir Plus Lenacapavir From a Complex HIV Treatment Regimen: A Randomized, Open-Label, Multicenter Phase 2 Study (ARTISTRY-1).Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2025Trial
- Healthcare Resource Consumption and Related Costs of People Living with HIV and Antiviral Treatment: A Retrospective Observational Study in Italy.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Understanding Perceived Pill Burden in Older Adults with HIV: Exploring Clinical and Demographic Determinants.AIDS and behavior · 2026Article
- [Real-world efficacy of switching to bictegravir/ emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide in pretreated patients with triple therapy containing rilpivirine].Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2022Article
- Switching from a Non-Protease inhibitor-Based Regimen To the Fixed Dose Combination of Darunavir/Cobicistat/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide in Clinical Practice.Drug design, development and therapy · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMulti-tablet regimens (MTRs) are associated with increased adverse events and non-adherence. Single tablet regimens (STRs) plus boosted protease inhibitors (PIs) are a simplification option for MTR-treated patients; however, data is needed to validate this therapeutic strategy.
methodsThis retrospective analysis included all HIV-1 infected patients seen at a single center from March 2016 to December 2017 who were switched from twice-daily (BID) regimens or regimens containing ≥ 3 pills daily to elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir-alafenamide (E/C/F/TAF) plus darunavir (DRV) or rilpivirine/emtricitabine/tenofovir-alafenamide (RPV/F/TAF) plus DRV boosted with ritonavir or cobicistat (DRV/r-c). Eligible patients had baseline HIV-1 RNA<200 copies/mL and were followed for 48 weeks. The primary endpoint was HIV-1 RNA≥50 copies/mL at Week 48. Adherence and safety data were recorded throughout the study.
resultsOf 61 patients included, median age was 53 years, the median number of pills taken daily (range) was 5 (3-9), 80% were taking BID regimens, 97% had baseline HIV-1 RNA<50 copies/mL, 56 (92%) were switched to E/C/F/TAF plus DRV and 5 (8%) to RPV/F/TAF plus DRV/r-c. At Week 48, 2 patients (3%) had HIV-1 RNA≥ 50 copies/mL, both were treated with E/C/F/TAF plus DRV and neither had evidence of treatment-emergent resistance. Fifty-nine (97%) had an HIV-1 RNA<50 copies/mL. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) occurred in 3/61 (5%) (all Grade 2) leading to 3/61 (5%) ADR-related discontinuations.
conclusionIn this real-world cohort of MTR-treated patients, switching to a TAF-based STR plus boosted PI maintained virologic control in 97% and was well-tolerated, supporting potential use of this strategy for regimen simplification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.