Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33329860›Full record

ArticleMalaysian family physician : the official journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia2020

Validity and reliability of the Patient Activation Measure® (PAM®)-13 Malay version among patients with Metabolic Syndrome in primary care.

N H Bahrom, A S Ramli, M R Isa, N Baharudin, S F Badlishah-Sham, M S Mohamed-Yassin, H Abdul-Hamid

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaysian family physician : the official journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05541120 (Effect of Remote Patient Monitoring and Patient Education on Patient Activation and Glycemic Control in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05541120 nawithdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Remote Patient Monitoring and Patient Education on Patient Activation and Glycemic Control in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes

TypeinterventionalSponsorTracy Jalbuena MDRan2022 to 2026Enrolled0ConditionsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2ArmsRemote Patient Monitoring
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Validation of the PAM-13 instrument in the Hungarian general population 40 years old and above.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. We need a research plan.Malaysian family physician : the official journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

N H BahromMD (Calgary), Department of Primary Care, Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Selayang Campus, Selangor, Malaysia.
A S RamliMBBS (Newcastle, UK), MRCGP (UK), Deputy Director, Institute of Pathology Laboratory and Forensic Medicine (I-PPerForM), Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Sungai Buloh, Selangor, Malaysia, Email: rossanis_yuzadi@yahoo.co.uk.
M R IsaMBBS (UM), MPH (UM), Department of Population Health and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Teknologi MARA Sungai Buloh Campus, Selangor Malaysia.
N BaharudinMBBS (Monash), FRACGP (Australia), Department of Primary Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Universiti Teknologi MARA, Selayang Campus, Selangor, Malaysia.
S F Badlishah-ShamMBBCh BAO (Cork, Ireland), MFamMed (UiTM), Department of Primary Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Universiti Teknologi MARA, Selayang Campus, Selangor, Malaysia.
M S Mohamed-YassinMBBS (Monash), FRACGP (Australia), Department of Primary Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Universiti Teknologi MARA, Selayang Campus, Selangor, Malaysia.
H Abdul-HamidMB BCh (Cardiff), MRCGP (UK), Department of Primary Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Universiti Teknologi MARA, Selayang Campus, Selangor, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe Patient Activation Measure (PAM) is one of the most extensively used, widely translated, and tested instruments worldwide in measuring patient activation levels in self-management. This study aimed to determine the validity and reliability of the PAM-13 Malay version among patients with Metabolic Syndrome (MetS) attending a primary care clinic.

methodsThis work is a cross-sectional validation study among patients with MetS attending a university primary care clinic in Selangor. The PAM-13 Malay version underwent a validation process and field testing. Psychometric properties were examined using principal component analysis (PCA) with varimax rotation, scree plot, Monte Carlo simulation, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability analyses.

resultsThe content of the PAM-13 Malay version and the original version were conceptually equivalent. The questionnaire was refined after face validation by 10 patients with MetS. The refined version was then field-tested among 130 participants (response rate 89.7%). The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin test was 0.767, and Bartlett's test of sphericity was ≤0.001, indicating sampling adequacy. Two factors were identified and labeled as (1) Passive and Building Knowledge, and (2) Taking Action and Maintaining Behavior. These labels were chosen as they were conceptually consistent with the items representing the levels of activation in PAM-13. The validated PAM-13 Malay version consisted of 13 items, framed into two domains. The overall Cronbach's α was 0.79, and the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.45.

conclusionsThe PAM-13 Malay version is valid, reliable, and fairly stable over time. This questionnaire can be used to evaluate the levels of activation among patients with MetS in primary care in Malaysia.

Indexed as

Malaysiametabolic syndromepatient activationprimary carevalidation

Identifiers

PMID33329860
PMCPMC7735884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.