Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33329816›Full record

ArticleAnesthesia and pain medicine2020

Analgesic effect of ropivacaine with fentanyl in comparison with ropivacaine alone for continuous femoral nerve block after knee replacement arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, double-blinded study.

Gunn Hee Kim, Joon Woo Lee, Go Eun Kim, Seong Su Lee, Shill Lee Son, Byung Uk Kim, Ha Na Cho, Mi Young Kwon, Min Seok Koo, Ji Eun Kim and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anesthesia and pain medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gunn Hee KimDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, National Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-0014-8297
Joon Woo LeeDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-7106-5229
Go Eun KimDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, National Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-7223-6317
Seong Su LeeDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, National Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1225-4617
Shill Lee SonDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, National Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9738-3973
Byung Uk KimDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, National Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9152-2709
Ha Na ChoDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, National Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-9077-9972
Mi Young KwonDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, National Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-0667-9494
Min Seok KooDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, National Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-2012-9616
Ji Eun KimDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, National Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8265-1952
Mi Jung YunDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, National Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-5838-4893
National Medical Center · KRSeoul National University Bundang Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe analgesic effect of perineural opioid in clinical practice are still controversial. This randomized controlled trial compared analgesic effect of ropivacaine with fentanyl or ropivacaine alone for continuous femoral nerve block following unilateral total knee arthroplasty.

methodsFourty patients of ASA PS Ⅰ or Ⅱ receiving total knee arthroplasty with spinal anesthesia were enlisted and randomly allocated into two groups. Group R; bolus injection of 0.375% ropivacaine, 30 ml and an infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine at 8 ml/h (n = 20). Group RF; 0.375% ropivacaine, 29 ml added with 50 μg of fentanyl as a bolus and an infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine mixed with 1 μg/ml of fentanyl at 8 ml/h (n = 20). Local anesthetic infusion via a femoral nerve catheter was started at the end of operation and continued for 48 h. Intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with hydromorphone (0.15 mg/ml, 0-1-10) were used for adjuvant analgesics. Position of catheter tip and contrast distribution, visual analogue scale of pain, hydromorphone consumption, side effects were recorded for 48 h after operation. Patient satisfaction for the pain control received were noted.

resultsThe pain visual analogue scale, incidences of side effects and satisfaction were not different between the two groups (P > 0.05), but the hydromorphone usage at 48 h after operation were lower in the Group RF than in the Group R (P = 0.047).

conclusionsThe analgesic effect of ropivacaine with fentanyl for continuous femoral nerve block after knee replacement arthroplasty was not superior to that of the ropivacaine alone.

Indexed as

Anesthesia and analgesiaFemoral nerveFentanylNerve blockRopivacaine

Identifiers

PMID33329816
PMCPMC7713827
OpenAlexW3023818078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.