ArticleFrontiers in genetics2020
Preimplantation Genetic Testing for a Chinese Family With X-Linked Lymphoproliferative Syndrome Type 1.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundX-linked lymphoproliferative disease (XLP) is a rare primary immunodeficiency disorder. We performed experiments based on two strategies of preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) for a family with XLP caused by a mutation in
methodsFirst, a single-cell polymerase chain reaction (PCR) protocol was established using single lymphocytes. A nested PCR experiment was performed with direct sequencing after whole genome amplification of single cells to assess the accuracy of the genetic diagnosis. Embryos obtained after intracytoplasmic sperm injection were biopsied on day 3 and detected using the established single-cell PCR protocol. In the second PGT cycle, targeted next generation sequencing (NGS) was performed and the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers flanking
resultIn the first PGT cycle, six embryos were biopsied. Discounting an embryo from a single failed PCR experiment, five embryos were identified, including three unaffected and two hemizygous. After PCR, one normal embryo was transferred when it was developing into an early blastocyst. Although the ultrasound images indicated a viable singleton pregnancy, the implantation was on the cesarean scar. Therefore, an artificial abortion was performed. In the haplotyping cycle, six embryos were identified to have inherited a haplotype without pathogenic mutations. After the embryo implantation process failed twice, a successful singleton pregnancy was established, and subsequently, a healthy female child was born.
conclusionTargeted NGS with haplotyping analysis circumvents the laborious process of multiplex PCR and is more likely to ensure diagnostic accuracy. However, when a genetic recombination occurs close to the site of mutation, confirmed identification using selected SNP markers can be challenging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.