Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33329628›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2020

Tomato Fruit Detection and Counting in Greenhouses Using Deep Learning.

Manya Afonso, Hubert Fonteijn, Felipe Schadeck Fiorentin, Dick Lensink, Marcel Mooij, Nanne Faber, Gerrit Polder, Ron Wehrens

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
26.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 231 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Plant counting: origins, development, and future paths.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Manya AfonsoWageningen University and Research, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Hubert FonteijnWageningen University and Research, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Felipe Schadeck FiorentinWageningen University and Research, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Dick LensinkEnza Zaden, Enkhuizen, Netherlands.
Marcel MooijEnza Zaden, Enkhuizen, Netherlands.
Nanne FaberEnza Zaden, Enkhuizen, Netherlands.
Gerrit PolderWageningen University and Research, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Ron WehrensWageningen University and Research, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Wageningen University & Research · NLEnza Zaden (Netherlands) · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurately detecting and counting fruits during plant growth using imaging and computer vision is of importance not only from the point of view of reducing labor intensive manual measurements of phenotypic information, but also because it is a critical step toward automating processes such as harvesting. Deep learning based methods have emerged as the state-of-the-art techniques in many problems in image segmentation and classification, and have a lot of promise in challenging domains such as agriculture, where they can deal with the large variability in data better than classical computer vision methods. This paper reports results on the detection of tomatoes in images taken in a greenhouse, using the MaskRCNN algorithm, which detects objects and also the pixels corresponding to each object. Our experimental results on the detection of tomatoes from images taken in greenhouses using a RealSense camera are comparable to or better than the metrics reported by earlier work, even though those were obtained in laboratory conditions or using higher resolution images. Our results also show that MaskRCNN can implicitly learn object depth, which is necessary for background elimination.

Indexed as

agriculturedeep learninggreenhousephenotypingtomato

Identifiers

PMID33329628
PMCPMC7717966
OpenAlexW3098093879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.