Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33329384›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in endocrinology2020

The Current Landscape of Clinical Studies Focusing on Thyroid Cancer: A Comprehensive Analysis of Study Characteristics and Their Publication Status.

Yihao Liu, Bin Li, Qiuyi Zheng, Jia Xu, Jie Li, Fenghua Lai, Bo Lin, Sui Peng, Weiming Lv, Haipeng Xiao

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Time to publication for results of clinical trials.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A comprehensive review and characterization of nasopharyngeal carcinoma clinical trials.World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yihao LiuClinical Trials Unit, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Bin LiClinical Trials Unit, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Qiuyi ZhengDepartment of Endocrinology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Jia XuClinical Trials Unit, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Jie LiDepartment of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Fenghua LaiDepartment of Endocrinology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Bo LinDepartment of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Sui PengClinical Trials Unit, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Weiming LvDepartment of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Haipeng XiaoDepartment of Endocrinology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: A better understanding of the current characteristics of clinical trials on thyroid cancer (TC) is important to improve trial designs and identify neglected areas of research. However, there is a lack of a thorough understanding of the clinical studies on TC. Therefore, this study aimed to present a comprehensive overview of clinical trials on TC based on the ClinicalTrials.gov database and evaluate their publication status. Methods: We searched for TC-related clinical studies registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov database before December 2018 by using the keyword "thyroid cancer" and assessed the characteristics of the included trials. We searched the publication status of primary completed studies in PubMed and Google Scholar. Results: A total of 450 studies were identified for analysis, including 333 (74.0%) interventional studies and 117 (26.0%) observational studies. Interventional studies about TC were commonly non-randomized (67.6%), single-arm (55.6%), single-center (76.3%), and early-phase (60.0%) trials. The major category for which studies were performed was for target drug-related therapy (53.6%). In addition, 57.0% of the primary completed interventional studies were published. The published studies were more commonly primary completed studies after 2010 and used randomization and were less commonly designed as single-arm studies and were conducted in the USA/Canada, compared to non-published studies ( Conclusions: High-quality, randomized phase 3 trials regarding TC are still insufficient. Therefore, more efforts are needed to improve the treatment of poor prognostic TC and timely publication.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicDatabases, FactualHumansPublishingRegistriesThyroid Neoplasmsclinical studiesClinicalTrials.govpublication statustargeted therapythyroid cancer

Identifiers

PMID33329384
PMCPMC7714929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.