ArticleFrontiers in psychology2020
The Power of Empowerment: Predictors and Benefits of Shared Leadership in Organizations.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Leading the way together: a cluster randomised controlled trial of the 5R Shared Leadership Program in older adult walking groups.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2022Trial
- An international qualitative exploration informing the development of a national sport mental health service for young athletes.Discover mental health · 2026Article
- A German translation and adaptation of the knowledge hiding scale.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- The psychology of leading together: free will beliefs, self-regulation, and self-efficacy in shared leadership.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Digital leadership enhances organizational resilience by fostering job crafting: the moderating role of organizational culture.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The effect of shared leadership on employee resilience: wielding the double-edged sword.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Digital leadership and employee innovative performance: the role of job crafting and person-job fit.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- The Power of Peer Leaders: Exploring the Link between Peer Leadership Behaviors and Sustainable Work Outcomes.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Empowering leadership during the COVID-19 outbreak: Implications for work satisfaction and effectiveness in organizational teams.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Article
- Digital Leadership and Employee Creativity: The Role of Employee Job Crafting and Person-Organization Fit.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Leadership plays an essential part in creating competitive advantage and well-being among employees. One way in which formal leaders can deal with the variety of responsibilities that comes with their role is to share their responsibilities with team members (i.e., shared leadership). Although there is abundant literature on how high-quality peer leadership benefits team effectiveness (TE) and well-being, there is only limited evidence about the underpinning mechanisms of these relationships and how the formal leader can support this process. To address this lacuna, we conducted an online survey study with 146 employees from various organizations. The results suggest that an empowering leadership style of the formal leader is associated with higher perceived peer leadership quality (PLQ) on four different leadership roles (i.e., task, motivational, social, and external leader). In addition, formal leaders who empower their team members are also perceived as better leaders themselves. Moreover, the improved PLQ was in turn positively related to TE and work satisfaction, while being negatively related to burnout. In line with the social identity approach, we found that team identification mediated these relationships. Thus, high-quality peer leaders succeeded in creating a shared sense of "us" in the team, and this team identification in turn generated all the positive outcomes. To conclude, by sharing their lead and empowering the peer leaders in their team, formal leaders are key drivers of the team's effectiveness, while also enhancing team members' health and well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.