Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33329048›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2020

Dynamic Hormone Control of Stress and Fertility.

Eder Zavala, Margaritis Voliotis, Tanja Zerenner, Joël Tabak, Jamie J Walker, Xiao Feng Li, John R Terry, Stafford L Lightman, Kevin O'Byrne, Krasimira Tsaneva-Atanasova

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Decoding a Hidden Energy State Based on Marked Point Process Cortisol Secretory Events During Cardiac Surgery.2024 IEEE International Conference on E-health Networking, Application & Services (HealthCom) · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Quantitative approaches in clinical reproductive endocrinology.Current opinion in endocrine and metabolic research · 2022
    Review
  13. Fast dynamics in the HPA axis: Insight from mathematical and experimental studies.Current opinion in endocrine and metabolic research · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Analysis of wearable time series data in endocrine and metabolic research.Current opinion in endocrine and metabolic research · 2022
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Mathematical models in GnRH research.Journal of neuroendocrinology · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Cardiovascular Implications of Immune Disorders in Women.Circulation research · 2022 · on this map
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Eder ZavalaCentre for Systems Modelling and Quantitative Biomedicine, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Margaritis VoliotisEPSRC Centre for Predictive Modelling in Healthcare, Living Systems Institute, College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.
Tanja ZerennerEPSRC Centre for Predictive Modelling in Healthcare, Living Systems Institute, College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.
Joël TabakInstitute of Biomedical and Clinical Science, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.
Jamie J WalkerEPSRC Centre for Predictive Modelling in Healthcare, Living Systems Institute, College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.
Xiao Feng LiDepartment of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
John R TerryCentre for Systems Modelling and Quantitative Biomedicine, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Stafford L LightmanHenry Wellcome Laboratory for Integrative Neuroscience and Endocrinology, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Kevin O'ByrneDepartment of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Krasimira Tsaneva-AtanasovaEPSRC Centre for Predictive Modelling in Healthcare, Living Systems Institute, College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council · GBKing's College London · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GBUniversity of Bristol · GBUniversity of Exeter · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/N008936/1Medical Research Council MR/N022637/1Medical Research Council MR/P014747/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuroendocrine axes display a remarkable diversity of dynamic signaling processes relaying information between the brain, endocrine glands, and peripheral target tissues. These dynamic processes include oscillations, elastic responses to perturbations, and plastic long term changes observed from the cellular to the systems level. While small transient dynamic changes can be considered physiological, larger and longer disruptions are common in pathological scenarios involving more than one neuroendocrine axes, suggesting that a robust control of hormone dynamics would require the coordination of multiple neuroendocrine clocks. The idea of apparently different axes being in fact exquisitely intertwined through neuroendocrine signals can be investigated in the regulation of stress and fertility. The stress response and the reproductive cycle are controlled by the Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal (HPA) axis and the Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Gonadal (HPG) axis, respectively. Despite the evidence surrounding the effects of stress on fertility, as well as of the reproductive cycle on stress hormone dynamics, there is a limited understanding on how perturbations in one neuroendocrine axis propagate to the other. We hypothesize that the links between stress and fertility can be better understood by considering the HPA and HPG axes as coupled systems. In this manuscript, we investigate neuroendocrine rhythms associated to the stress response and reproduction by mathematically modeling the HPA and HPG axes as a network of interlocked oscillators. We postulate a network architecture based on physiological data and use the model to predict responses to stress perturbations under different hormonal contexts: normal physiological, gonadectomy, hormone replacement with estradiol or corticosterone (CORT), and high excess CORT (hiCORT) similar to hypercortisolism in humans. We validate our model predictions against experiments in rodents, and show how the dynamic responses of these endocrine axes are consistent with our postulated network architecture. Importantly, our model also predicts the conditions that ensure robustness of fertility to stress perturbations, and how chronodisruptions in glucocorticoid hormones can affect the reproductive axis' ability to withstand stress. This insight is key to understand how chronodisruption leads to disease, and to design interventions to restore normal rhythmicity and health.

Indexed as

CORTfertilityglucocorticoidsGnRH pulse generatorhypercortisolismKNDy networkmathematical modelstress

Identifiers

PMID33329048
PMCPMC7718016
OpenAlexW3102630991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.