Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33329000›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2020

Rationale for COVID-19 Treatment by Nebulized Interferon-β-1b-Literature Review and Personal Preliminary Experience.

Aurélien Mary, Lucie Hénaut, Pierre Yves Macq, Louise Badoux, Arnaud Cappe, Thierry Porée, Myriam Eckes, Hervé Dupont, Michel Brazier

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Particularities of Pharmaceutical Care in Improving Public Health Service during the COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Aurélien MaryClinical Critical Care Pharmacy Department, Amiens-Picardie University Hospital, Amiens, France.
Lucie HénautUR UPJV 7517, MP3CV, CURS, University of Picardie Jules Verne, Amiens, France.
Pierre Yves MacqSurgical Critical Care Department, Amiens-Picardie University Hospital, Amiens, France.
Louise BadouxSurgical Critical Care Department, Amiens-Picardie University Hospital, Amiens, France.
Arnaud CappeClinical Critical Care Pharmacy Department, Amiens-Picardie University Hospital, Amiens, France.
Thierry PoréeProtecSom-OptimHal, Valognes, France.
Myriam EckesProtecSom-OptimHal, Valognes, France.
Hervé DupontUR UPJV 7517, MP3CV, CURS, University of Picardie Jules Verne, Amiens, France.
Michel BrazierUR UPJV 7517, MP3CV, CURS, University of Picardie Jules Verne, Amiens, France.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Amiens-Picardie · FRMécanismes physiopathologiques et conséquences des calcifications cardiovasculaires · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The inflammatory response to COVID-19 is specifically associated with an impaired type I interferon (IFN) response and complete blockade of IFN-β secretion. Clinically, nebulization of IFN-α-2b has been historically used in China to treat viral pneumonia associated with SARS-CoV. Very recent data show that the use of inhaled type I IFN is associated with decreased mortality in Chinese COVID-19 patients. However, IFN nebulization is currently not standard in Europe and the United States. Therefore, our group has set up a project aimed to evaluate the possibility to nebulize IFN-β-1b (a drug currently used in Europe to treat multiple sclerosis via subcutaneous injections) and to assess the safety of this new mode of administration in SARS-CoV-2 infected patients. We present here literature data that allowed us to build our hypothesis and to develop collaboration between clinical pharmacists, intensivists and nebulization engineers in order to gain first pre-clinical and clinical experience of IFN-β-1b nebulization. After validation of the nebulization method and verification of droplet size compatible with nebulization, the method has been applied to four intensive care patients treated at our university hospital, for whom none of the COVID-19 therapies initially used in France led to significant clinical improvement. All patients exhibited negative viral carriage and experienced clinical improvement 7-16 days after having initiated nebulized IFN-β-1b inhalation therapy. No side effects were observed. All patients were alive within a 90-days follow-up. Although it is not possible to draw firm conclusions on treatment efficacy based on this case report, our study shows that pulmonary IFN-β-1b administration is feasible, with a good safety profile. This procedure, which presents the advantage of directly targeting the lungs and reducing the risks of systemic side effects, may represent a promising therapeutic strategy for the care of patients with severe COVID-19. However, our preliminary observation requires confirmation by randomized controlled trials.

Indexed as

COVID-19inflammationinterferon-β-1bnebulizationSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID33329000
PMCPMC7734101
OpenAlexW3109695655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.