Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33328883›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in molecular neuroscience2020

MIRRAGGE - Minimum Information Required for Reproducible AGGregation Experiments.

Pedro M Martins, Susanna Navarro, Alexandra Silva, Maria F Pinto, Zsuzsa Sárkány, Francisco Figueiredo, Pedro José Barbosa Pereira, Francisca Pinheiro, Zuzana Bednarikova, Michał Burdukiewicz and 11 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in molecular neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Effect of the aggregated protein dye YAT2150 onAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Variability of Amyloid Propensity in Imperfect Repeats of CsgA Protein ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Pedro M MartinsInstituto de Biologia Molecular e Celular and Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Susanna NavarroInstitut de Biotecnologia i Biomedicina - Departament de Bioquímica i Biologia Molecular, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain.
Alexandra SilvaInstituto de Biologia Molecular e Celular and Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Maria F PintoInstituto de Biologia Molecular e Celular and Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Zsuzsa SárkányInstituto de Biologia Molecular e Celular and Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Francisco FigueiredoInstituto de Biologia Molecular e Celular and Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Pedro José Barbosa PereiraInstituto de Biologia Molecular e Celular and Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Francisca PinheiroInstitut de Biotecnologia i Biomedicina - Departament de Bioquímica i Biologia Molecular, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain.
Zuzana BednarikovaDepartment of Biophysics, Institute of Experimental Physics, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Kosice, Slovakia.
Michał BurdukiewiczFaculty of Mathematics and Information Science, Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw, Poland.
Oxana V GalzitskayaInstitute of Protein Research, Russian Academy of Sciences, Pushchino, Russia.
Zuzana GazovaDepartment of Biophysics, Institute of Experimental Physics, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Kosice, Slovakia.
Cláudio M GomesBiosystems and Integrative Sciences Institute and Departamento de Química e Bioquímica, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Annalisa PastoreUK-DRI Centre at King's College London, the Maurice Wohl Clinical Neuroscience Institute, London, United Kingdom.
Louise C SerpellSussex Neuroscience, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom.
Rostislav SkrabanaDepartment of Neuroimmunology, Axon Neuroscience R&D Services SE, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Vytautas SmirnovasInstitute of Biotechnology, Life Sciences Center, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Mantas ZiaunysInstitute of Biotechnology, Life Sciences Center, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Daniel E OtzenInterdisciplinary Nanoscience Center (iNANO) and Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Salvador VenturaInstitut de Biotecnologia i Biomedicina - Departament de Bioquímica i Biologia Molecular, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain.
Sandra Macedo-RibeiroInstituto de Biologia Molecular e Celular and Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reports on phase separation and amyloid formation for multiple proteins and aggregation-prone peptides are recurrently used to explore the molecular mechanisms associated with several human diseases. The information conveyed by these reports can be used directly in translational investigation, e.g., for the design of better drug screening strategies, or be compiled in databases for benchmarking novel aggregation-predicting algorithms. Given that minute protocol variations determine different outcomes of protein aggregation assays, there is a strong urge for standardized descriptions of the different types of aggregates and the detailed methods used in their production. In an attempt to address this need, we assembled the Minimum Information Required for Reproducible Aggregation Experiments (MIRRAGGE) guidelines, considering first-principles and the established literature on protein self-assembly and aggregation. This consensus information aims to cover the major and subtle determinants of experimental reproducibility while avoiding excessive technical details that are of limited practical interest for non-specialized users. The MIRRAGGE table (template available in Supplementary Information) is useful as a guide for the design of new studies and as a checklist during submission of experimental reports for publication. Full disclosure of relevant information also enables other researchers to reproduce results correctly and facilitates systematic data deposition into curated databases.

Indexed as

amyloidpeptidephase separationproteinreproducible data

Identifiers

PMID33328883
PMCPMC7729192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.