ArticleBritish paramedic journal2019
Do paediatric early warning scores relate to emergency department outcomes for children aged 0-2 years brought in by ambulance?
Article in British paramedic journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAmbulance service policy requires paramedics in certain parts of the UK to transport children aged 0-2 years to hospital, regardless of their presenting complaint. While there are a number of paediatric early warning scores (PEWS) that exist to detect deterioration in the hospitalised child, no study has considered the potential relationship between a PEWS recorded by the ambulance service and emergency department (ED) outcome. This study aims to evaluate and understand the potential utility of PEWS in an ambulance service setting.
methodsA retrospective analysis of patient reports was undertaken, using data from the London Ambulance Service (LAS) and St Mary's Hospital, Paddington, collected over a 12-month period (June 2013 to June 2014). PEWS were calculated using LAS vital signs and compared against ED discharge outcomes.
resultsFrom a randomised sample of 300 patient records, 169 were included in the final analysis. A total of 100/169 (59.2%) were discharged to home, 30 (17.8%) referred to their GP and 18 (10.7%) were admitted following assessment in the ED. A total of 87/169 had a PEWS of 1, with the vast majority of PEWS 1 (n = 64) resulting in discharge to home.
conclusionPEWS demonstrated high specificity, but poor sensitivity in all outcome measures. As a potential diagnostic test to predict ED outcome, in this study PEWS performed poorly. Further work is required to determine the utility of PEWS, or other early warning scores, for use in an out-of-hospital setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.