Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33328484›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Genomic profiling reveals high frequency of DNA repair genetic aberrations in gallbladder cancer.

Reham Abdel-Wahab, Timothy A Yap, Russell Madison, Shubham Pant, Matthew Cooke, Kai Wang, Haitao Zhao, Tanios Bekaii-Saab, Elif Karatas, Lawrence N Kwong and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. A Phase II Multicenter Trial of Rucaparib and Nivolumab as Maintenance Therapy in Patients with Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer: BilT-02.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Clinical and Genomic Characterization ofJCO global oncology · 2024
    Article
  16. Recent Advances in Immunotherapy for Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer.Current treatment options in oncology · 2024
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Reham Abdel-WahabDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Timothy A YapInvestigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Russell MadisonFoundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Shubham PantDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Matthew CookeFoundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Kai WangFoundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Haitao ZhaoPeking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Tanios Bekaii-SaabMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Elif KaratasDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Lawrence N KwongDepartment of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Funda Meric-BernstamInvestigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Mitesh BoradMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Milind JavleDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. mjavle@mdanderson.org.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USFoundation Medicine (United States)Mayo Clinic in Arizona · USPeking Union Medical College Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA repair gene aberrations (GAs) occur in several cancers, may be prognostic and are actionable. We investigated the frequency of DNA repair GAs in gallbladder cancer (GBC), association with tumor mutational burden (TMB), microsatellite instability (MSI), programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), and its ligand (PD-L1) expression. Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) of 760 GBC was performed. We investigated GAs in 19 DNA repair genes including direct DNA repair genes (ATM, ATR, BRCA1, BRCA2, FANCA, FANCD2, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PALB2, POLD1, POLE, PRKDC, and RAD50) and caretaker genes (BAP1, CDK12, MLL3, TP53, and BLM) and classified patients into 3 groups based on TMB level: low (< 5.5 mutations/Mb), intermediate (5.5-19.5 mutations/Mb), and high (≥ 19.5 mutations/Mb). We assessed MSI status and PD-1 & PD-L1 expression. 658 (86.6%) had at least 1 actionable GA. Direct DNA repair gene GAs were identified in 109 patients (14.2%), while 476 (62.6%) had GAs in caretaker genes. Both direct and caretaker DNA repair GAs were significantly associated with high TMB (P = 0.0005 and 0.0001, respectively). Tumor PD-L1 expression was positive in 119 (15.6%), with 17 (2.2%) being moderate or high. DNA repair GAs are relatively frequent in GBC and associated with coexisting actionable mutations and a high TMB.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overB7-H1 AntigenBiomarkers, TumorDNA RepairFemaleGallbladder NeoplasmsGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenome, HumanGenomicsHumansMaleMicrosatellite InstabilityMiddle AgedMutationB7-H1 AntigenBiomarkers, TumorNeoplasm ProteinsProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorTumor Suppressor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID33328484
PMCPMC7745036
OpenAlexW3111350541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.