Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33328456›Full record

ArticleHorticulture research2020

Transcriptional regulation of bark freezing tolerance in apple (Malus domestica Borkh.).

Yinghai Liang, Shanshan Wang, Chenhui Zhao, Xinwei Ma, Yiyong Zhao, Jing Shao, Yuebo Li, Honglian Li, Hongwei Song, Hong Ma and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Horticulture research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
10.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Yinghai LiangInstitute of Pomology, Jilin Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 136100, Gongzhuling, People's Republic of China.
Shanshan WangInstitute of Pomology, Jilin Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 136100, Gongzhuling, People's Republic of China.
Chenhui ZhaoInstitute of Pomology, Jilin Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 136100, Gongzhuling, People's Republic of China.
Xinwei MaDepartment of Biology, Eberly College of Science, and The Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Yiyong ZhaoMinistry of Education Key Laboratory of Biodiversity Sciences and Ecological Engineering, Collaborative Innovation Center for Genetics and Development, Institute of Biodiversity Sciences, Institute of Plant Biology, Center for Evolutionary Biology, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, 200438, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Jing ShaoInstitute of Pomology, Jilin Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 136100, Gongzhuling, People's Republic of China.
Yuebo LiInstitute of Pomology, Jilin Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 136100, Gongzhuling, People's Republic of China.
Honglian LiInstitute of Pomology, Jilin Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 136100, Gongzhuling, People's Republic of China.
Hongwei SongInstitute of Pomology, Jilin Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 136100, Gongzhuling, People's Republic of China.
Hong MaDepartment of Biology, Eberly College of Science, and The Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Hao LiDepartment of Biology, Eberly College of Science, and The Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA. hul573@psu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0338-7330
Bingbing ZhangInstitute of Pomology, Jilin Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 136100, Gongzhuling, People's Republic of China. zbb4005@163.com.
Liangsheng ZhangGenomics and Genetic Engineering Laboratory of Ornamental Plants, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, 310058, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China. zls83@zju.edu.cn.
Jilin Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNPennsylvania State University · USFudan University · CNZhejiang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Freezing tolerance is a significant trait in plants that grow in cold environments and survive through the winter. Apple (Malus domestica Borkh.) is a cold-tolerant fruit tree, and the cold tolerance of its bark is important for its survival at low temperatures. However, little is known about the gene activity related to its freezing tolerance. To better understand the gene expression and regulation properties of freezing tolerance in dormant apple trees, we analyzed the transcriptomic divergences in the bark from 1-year-old branches of two apple cultivars, "Golden Delicious" (G) and "Jinhong" (H), which have different levels of cold resistance, under chilling and freezing treatments. "H" can safely overwinter below -30 °C in extremely low-temperature regions, whereas "G" experiences severe freezing damage and death in similar environments. Based on 28 bark transcriptomes (from the epidermis, phloem, and cambium) from 1-year-old branches under seven temperature treatments (from 4 to -29 °C), we identified 4173 and 7734 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in "G" and "H", respectively, between the chilling and freezing treatments. A gene coexpression network was constructed according to this expression information using weighted gene correlation network analysis (WGCNA), and seven biologically meaningful coexpression modules were identified from the network. The expression profiles of the genes from these modules suggested the gene regulatory pathways that are responsible for the chilling and freezing stress responses of "G" and/or "H." Module 7 was probably related to freezing acclimation and freezing damage in "H" at the lower temperatures. This module contained more interconnected hub transcription factors (TFs) and cold-responsive genes (CORs). Modules 6 and 7 contained C-repeat binding factor (CBF) TFs, and many CBF-dependent homologs were identified as hub genes. We also found that some hub TFs had higher intramodular connectivity (K

Identifiers

PMID33328456
PMCPMC7705664
OpenAlexW3107562635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.