Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33328317›Full record

ArticleBMJ open quality2020

Post-discharge care following acute kidney injury: quality improvement in primary care.

Susan J Howard, Rebecca Elvey, Julius Ohrnberger, Alex J Turner, Laura Anselmi, Anne-Marie Martindale, Tom Blakeman

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open quality, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07626268 (CONNECT-AKI), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07626268 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

CONNECT-AKI: COordiNated CommuNication, Education, and Care Transitions After Acute Kidney Injury - A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorNorthwell HealthRan2026 to 2027Enrolled160ConditionsAcute Kidney Injury, Acute Kidney Injury (AKI)ArmsAKI Discharge Summary Template, Chat-Based Educational Messaging Program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Quality of Discharge Summaries After Acute Kidney Injury.Canadian journal of kidney health and disease · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Susan J HowardNIHR Applied Research Collaboration Greater Manchester (ARC-GM), Health Innovation Manchester, Manchester, UK susan.howard@healthinnovationmanchester.com.ORCID 0000-0003-0340-2016
Rebecca ElveyNIHR Applied Research Collaboration Greater Manchester (ARC-GM), Health Innovation Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Julius OhrnbergerDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Alex J TurnerHealth Organisation, Policy and Economics (HOPE) group, Centre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Laura AnselmiHealth Organisation, Policy and Economics (HOPE) group, Centre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Anne-Marie MartindaleNIHR Applied Research Collaboration Greater Manchester (ARC-GM), Health Innovation Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Tom BlakemanNIHR Applied Research Collaboration Greater Manchester (ARC-GM), Health Innovation Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Manchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBHealth Innovation Manchester · GBImperial College London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/R015600/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOver the past decade, targeting acute kidney injury (AKI) has become a priority to improve patient safety and health outcomes. Illness complicated by AKI is common and is associated with adverse outcomes including high rates of unplanned hospital readmission. Through national patient safety directives, NHS England has mandated the implementation of an AKI clinical decision support system in hospitals. In order to improve care following AKI, hospitals have also been incentivised to improve discharge summaries and general practices are recommended to establish registers of people who have had an episode of illness complicated by AKI. However, to date, there is limited evidence surrounding the development and impact of interventions following AKI.

designWe conducted a quality improvement project in primary care aiming to improve the management of patients following an episode of hospital care complicated by AKI. All 31 general practices within a single NHS Clinical Commissioning Group were incentivised by a locally commissioned service to engage in audit and feedback, education training and to develop an action plan at each practice to improve management of AKI.

resultsAKI coding in general practice increased from 28% of cases in 2015/2016 to 50% in 2017/2018. Coding of AKI was associated with significant improvements in downstream patient management in terms of conducting a medication review within 1 month of hospital discharge, monitoring kidney function within 3 months and providing written information about AKI to patients. However, there was no effect on unplanned hospitalisation and mortality.

conclusionThe findings suggest that the quality improvement intervention successfully engaged a primary care workforce in AKI-related care, but that a higher intensity intervention is likely to be required to improve health outcomes. Development of a real-time audit tool is necessary to better understand and minimise the impact of the high mortality rate following AKI.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjuryPatient DischargeQuality ImprovementAftercareHumansPrimary Health Careacute kidney injuryaudit and feedbackclinical auditpatient safetyprimary care

Identifiers

PMID33328317
PMCPMC7745694
OpenAlexW3111943072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.