Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33328264›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

COVID-19 confessions: a qualitative exploration of healthcare workers experiences of working with COVID-19.

Paul Bennett, S Noble, Stephen Johnston, David Jones, Rachael Hunter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 99 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
99citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

99 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Teamwork and relational infrastructure: a qualitative study of modern UK general practice.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Depicting occupational trauma concepts impacting nurse well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

39 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Paul BennettDepartment of Psychology, Swansea University, Swansea, UK p.d.bennett@swansea.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2252-6065
S NobleDivision of Population Medicine, Marie Curie Research Centre, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Stephen JohnstonDepartment of Psychology, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
David JonesDept Anaesthetics and Critical Care, Prince Charles Hospital, Merthyr Tydfil, UK.
Rachael HunterDepartment of Psychology, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.

Funding

Marie Curie MCCC-FCO-11-C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo gain insight into the experiences and concerns of front-line National Health Service (NHS) workers while caring for patients with COVID-19.

designQualitative analysis of data collected through an anonymous website (www.covidconfidential) provided a repository of uncensored COVID-19 experiences of front-line NHS workers, accessed via a link advertised on the Twitter feed of two high profile medical tweeters and their retweets.

settingCommunity of NHS workers who accessed this social media.

participants54 healthcare workers, including doctors, nurses and physiotherapists, accessed the website and left a 'story'.

resultsStories ranged from 1 word to 10 min in length. Thematic analysis identified common themes, with a central aspect being the experience and psychological consequence of trauma. Specific themes were: (1) the shock of the virus, (2) staff sacrifice and dedication, (3) collateral damage ranging from personal health concerns to the long-term impact on, and care of, discharged patients and (4) a hierarchy of power and inequality within the healthcare system.

conclusionsCOVID-19 confidential gave an outlet for unprompted and uncensored stories of healthcare workers in the context of COVID-19. In addition to personal experiences of trauma, there were perceptions that many operational difficulties stemmed from inequalities of power between management and front-line workers. Learning from these experiences will reduce staff distress and improve patient care in the face of further waves of the pandemic.

Indexed as

AdultCOVID-19FemaleHealth PersonnelHospital AdministrationHumansMaleMental HealthMiddle AgedNursesOccupational StressPhysical TherapistsPhysiciansPsychological TraumaQualitative ResearchSARS-CoV-2COVID-19human resource managementmental health

Identifiers

PMID33328264
PMCPMC7745452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.