Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33328164›Full record

SynthesisBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2020

Effectiveness of hospital clowns for symptom management in paediatrics: systematic review of randomised and non-randomised controlled trials.

Luís Carlos Lopes-Júnior, Emiliana Bomfim, Karin Olson, Eliane Tatsch Neves, Denise Sayuri Calheiros Silveira, Michelle Darezzo Rodrigues Nunes, Lucila Castanheira Nascimento, Gabriela Pereira-da-Silva, Regina Aparecida Garcia Lima

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Constructing knowledge and moral skills through hospital clown interventions: a qualitative study.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Luís Carlos Lopes-JúniorFederal University of Espírito Santo, Avenida Marechal Campus, 1468 Maruípe, Vitória, 29.043-900, ES, Brazil lopesjr.lc@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-2424-6510
Emiliana BomfimUniversity of Saskatchewan, College of Medicine, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Karin OlsonUniversity of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Eliane Tatsch NevesFederal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil.
Denise Sayuri Calheiros SilveiraFederal Institute of Espírito Santo, Linhares, ES, Brazil.
Michelle Darezzo Rodrigues NunesRio de Janeiro State University, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Lucila Castanheira NascimentoUniversity of São Paulo at Ribeirão Preto College of Nursing, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Gabriela Pereira-da-SilvaUniversity of São Paulo at Ribeirão Preto College of Nursing, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Regina Aparecida Garcia LimaUniversity of São Paulo at Ribeirão Preto College of Nursing, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Universidade de Ribeirão Preto · BRInstituto Federal do Espírito Santo · BRUniversidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro · BRUniversidade Federal de Santa Maria · BRUniversidade Federal do Espírito Santo · BRUniversity of Alberta · CAUniversity of Saskatchewan · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate evidence from randomised controlled trials and non-randomised controlled trials on the effectiveness of hospital clowns for a range of symptom clusters in children and adolescents admitted to hospital with acute and chronic conditions.

designSystematic review of randomised and non-randomised controlled trials. DATA SOURCES: Medline, ISI of Knowledge, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Science Direct, Scopus, American Psychological Association PsycINFO, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature. STUDY SELECTION: Randomised and non-randomised controlled trials were peer reviewed using the following eligibility criteria: children and adolescents who were admitted to hospital for acute conditions or chronic disorders, studies comparing use of hospital clowns with standard care, and studies evaluating the effect of hospital clowns on symptom management of inpatient children and adolescents as a primary outcome. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two investigators independently screened studies, extracted data, and appraised the risk of bias. Methodological appraisal was assessed by two investigators independently using the Jadad scale, the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomised controlled trials (RoB 2), and the risk of bias in non-randomised studies (ROBINS-I) tool for non-randomised controlled trials.

results24 studies (n=1612) met the inclusion criteria for data extraction and analysis. Most studies were randomised controlled trials (n=13). Anxiety was the most frequently analysed symptom (n=13), followed by pain (n=9), psychological and emotional responses and perceived wellbeing (n=4), stress (n=4), cancer related fatigue (n=3), and crying (n=2). Five studies used biomarkers, mainly cortisol, to assess stress or fatigue outcome following hospital clowns. Most of the randomised controlled trials (n=11; 85%) were rated as showing some concerns, and two trials were rated with a high risk of bias. Most non-randomised controlled trials (n=6; 55%) were rated with a moderate risk of bias according to ROBINS-I tool. Studies showed that children and adolescents who were in the presence of hospital clowns, either with or without a parent present, reported significantly less anxiety during a range of medical procedures, as well as improved psychological adjustment (P<0.05). Three studies that evaluated chronic conditions showed favourable results for the intervention of hospital clowns with significant reduction in stress, fatigue, pain, and distress (P<0.05).

conclusionsThese findings suggest that the presence of hospital clowns during medical procedures, induction of anaesthesia in the preoperative room, and as part of routine care for chronic conditions might be a beneficial strategy to manage some symptom clusters. Furthermore, hospital clowns might help improve psychological wellbeing in admitted children and adolescents with acute and chronic disorders, compared with those who received only standard care. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42018107099.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAnxietyChildChild, HospitalizedChronic DiseaseFatigueHumansLaughter TherapyNon-Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicPain ManagementRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicStress, Psychological

Identifiers

PMID33328164
PMCPMC7737653
OpenAlexW3113048596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.